User talk:ZAYBXC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 14:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Christoph Clauser (October 27)
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The comment the reviewer left was:
He may well pass notability under #C1, although I am not certain. More critical gor the moment far too much of this is unsourced, the only references being his. Truly independent sources are needed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christoph Clauser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- @Ldm1954 Thank you for your review. Please explain which sources you rate as unreliable - I cannot understand this ZAYBXC (talk) 19:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- I said you need more reliable sources. Currently all you have are a few of his papers. You need independent sources, and everything must be verified by a source. At the moment at least 1/2 (maybe 3/4 or more) has no source to verify the statements. Much of it also should be removed, it should not be a CV or an essay.
- See this guide for some general suggestions. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for coming back with questions,but I don't understand what exactly you are missing independent sources for. Because the references for the cited publications are all given. Please explain - thank you! ZAYBXC (talk) 14:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- The only inline sources you have are to his papers, which are OK but not critical. There is nothing to verify anything else, for instance his career, family, awards etc. Everything must be independently verified with sources. While you can use an official CV for some, you need other sources. It may take work to find them. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for coming back with questions,but I don't understand what exactly you are missing independent sources for. Because the references for the cited publications are all given. Please explain - thank you! ZAYBXC (talk) 14:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
 |
Hello, ZAYBXC!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 14:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC) |
AfC notification: Draft:Christoph Clauser has a new comment
AfC notification: Draft:Christoph Clauser has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Christoph Clauser (February 21)
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
The comment the reviewer left was:
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
I also suggest you review this page to improve potential resubmission.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christoph Clauser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Christoph Clauser has a new comment
AfC notification: Draft:Christoph Clauser has a new comment