User talk:ZeroJaguar

Hi ZeroJaguar! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

you can email me if you prefer privacy but I need to establish you are not a sock puppet. If you are a clean start ail arbcom.as they maintain a register of them. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:20, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay, I actually have a feeling of regret for having failed to comply with WP:SOCK, and I wanted to do a clean start unbound by the black mark I left, but following your request, my previous accounts were User:SuperFeral, User:FreedomWarWiki, User:MarioSonicPlayer and User:HedgehogLegend. Because I was young when I contributed back then (I was only 13--14 years old, and I'm 17 now), I have matured in the period of my absence in the English Wikipedia, and I now better understand the policy and I know not to repeat the same mistake (i.e. I understand the general rule is to use only one account), is it possible for me to continue editing on the English Wikipedia on this account, or even other accounts so long as I disclose them? I have lost access to these accounts, so this is my the only account I have access to. All I ask from you and others in the community is forgiveness: we're all human, and I promise to comply with other policies and guidelines and not to repeat the same mistake. ZeroJaguar (talk) 21:37, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

ok, so this isn't how it works. You can't create a new account when you are already blocked. I have blocked you as a sockpuppet but I respect your honesty. If you wish to edit, you need to request an unblock. Which given time, your honesty and your growing older is likely to be looked upon favourably. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:57, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

So since I want to outgrow my prior violations of WP:SOCK and make legitimate contributions in compliance with policies and guidelines, do you have any feedback on how I can get unblocked? I'm not asking to be unblocked, and I understand that it may take time, but I want to know what I should do or what is recommended for me to do if I want to be unblocked and return to making legitimate contributions. ZeroJaguar (talk) 22:07, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

put an unblock request up. The details are in the block template. I would recommend you talk about your growth since you were blocked and follow the guide to making unblocks. Fwiw declaring your socks is actually a positive to letting you edit again. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:47, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

See also WP:Standard offer. If you had started out by acknowledging your past transgressions and requesting unblock then it likely would have been accepted. Sometimes User:Tamzin/Adverse possession unblocks happen, but some members of the community, myself included, are near-categorically opposed to them. * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 01:32, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ZeroJaguar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I was young when I violated WP:SOCK, 14--15 at the time, and in the years since then, I have gained the necessary maturity to understand the policy, now being aged 17. Now that I understand that the general rule is that I must only use one account unless I have good reasons to use multiple accounts, I promise I will not repeat the same mistake, and I promise I will prioritize making good contributions. ZeroJaguar (talk) 08:49, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I'm willing to give you a second chance. Welcome back. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:02, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

ZeroJaguar (talk) 08:49, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

I'm concerned by your recent advocacy of an article on a subject widely harassed online that we have determined we do not want to host to avoid further victimisation. Since I can see that this isn't your main focus of activity, so I'm interested in what this scenario has taught you. Regarding the previous socking, I'm minded to overlook that due to the passage of time and your honesty in declaring them also counts strongly in your favour. Secondchance likely applies but first, I want to hear your thoughts about the first question Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:57, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

First off, I did not have any involvement in the harassment campaign (in fact, terms like "lolcow" are news to me), and I just thought that the existence of a decent number reliable sources was already enough to allow for an article. But to answer the first question, if there can't be an article on the subject in the English Wikipedia, then so be it: the harassment campaign means that, even if the subject meets WP:N, the current climate and the contentious nature of the topic means it's not possible in our current scenario to create a WP:BLP-compliant article. I would rather not have an article on the subject than have one that could become a target of gross WP:BLP violations. ZeroJaguar (talk) 10:11, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for this. Assuming good faith, I have no objection to your being unblocked by another admin as a second chance. If this happens you should understand that your editing will be watched by multiple editors and will need to keep your nose clean. Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:21, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Again, this is my no means begging, but I want to know if I will now be unblocked, or when (of an "if" if not certain) I will be unblocked. I understand that an unblocking is not a get-out-of-jail free card, and I promise I will avoid similar behavior and other conducts/behaviors in violation of other policies and guidelines. ZeroJaguar (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

We are doing the wiki equivalent of paperwork here. If you have a clean bill of health from the checkuser then you have a decent chance of being unblocked. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:51, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

It's worth pointing out that the original accounts were CU blocked. Hence I believe this also qualifies as a CU block, and hence {{checkuser needed}} * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 14:41, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

I'm not seeing any obvious signs of current socking. This discharges your requirement to consult with a CU. RoySmith (talk) 16:51, 7 June 2026 (UTC)