Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible

Biblical criticism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi everyone

I noticed that several articles of Bible translation like Pashto, Turkmen, Uzbek, Kyrgyz, Konkani, Kannada,Buryat, Kalmyk and many more articles on Category:Bible translations by language those can't established notability under WP:GNG.

Some pages have info but not backed by citation.

獅眠洞 (talk) 12:31, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

I have some suggestion

1. merge all those articles with List of Bible translations by language.
2. provide sufficient sources to establish notability above mentioned articles.

Mr.Lazy Guy (talk) 10:16, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

at Talk:Massacre_of_the_Innocents#Infobox_image. Please respond there. Johnbod (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Biblical Hebrew has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Wikieancneasthisto (talk · contribs) has made a number of oddly-sourced edits to Bible-related pages that I think would benefit from some attention.

This edit to Sodom and Gomorrah is typical. It adds a claim about the possible historicity of the story based on a claim about the meanings of the Hebrew words, referenced to a Korean book with a 2026 publication date. With a little google-searching I did not see the claim in the English-language academic biblical literature, which indicates to me that the claim may not be widely accepted.

Similarly these edits to Lot's wife insert a speculation about pillar of salt which, again, I have not found in the scholarly literature.

Reviewing the editor's contributions reveals a host of edits to Bible-related pages, frequently sourced to the one Korean book. But also to a self-published book by one Gerald Aardsma and possibly other sources.

I reverted the Sodom and Gomorrah edit, a few others have been reverted by other editors. But a bunch still stand.

I left a question on the editor's talk page four days ago, with no response yet. -- M.boli (talk) 16:05, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I've just removed some similar material by the same editor from Deborah. ~2026-40514-1 (talk) 15:09, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I've warned them, told them to stop. Clearly not an rs. Doug Weller talk 12:12, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Just reverted a similar edit by the same user at Neferkasokar. ~2026-65066-5 (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Enough is enough, I blocked them. Doug Weller talk 20:08, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

(I'm not related to the other TAs above). I did some cleanup but there remains the Eve article that still uses the source for a new paragraph. I let it stand for now, review welcome. ~2026-64883-8 (talk) 00:35, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh and Historicity of the Bible referring to a Youtube video without link/id. ~2026-64883-8 (talk) 00:53, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sarah#Requested move 9 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 04:15, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, unknown colleague!

The Book of Genesis (the first part of the Bible) contains very ancient data that predates the text itself—for example, mentions of ironworking or distinctly Ancient Egyptian terms like "Abrek" (meaning "Bend the knee"). While browsing Wikipedia, I noticed that such insights are currently scattered across various different articles. Therefore, I propose creating a dedicated article where information regarding these ancient "inclusions" in the Book of Genesis would be gathered in one place. At the very least, this would demonstrate the venerable age of this authoritative source.

I've written a draft of an article for "Article Wizard". https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Ancient_insertions_in_Genesis&action=submit This draft contains a table for Chapter 1. If the community supports this idea, we can develop similar tables for the subsequent chapters of Genesis.

What are your thoughts on this, my dear friend?

Respectfully,

New-man-in-the-street

20 Feb. 2026 New-man-in-the-street (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Christianity and Judaism#Requested move 15 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 04:24, 1 March 2026 (UTC)