Yosemite Decimal System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Yosemite Decimal System (YDS) is a five-part grading system used for rating the difficulty of rock climbing routes in the United States and Canada.[1] It was first devised by members of the Sierra Club in Southern California in the 1950s as a refinement of earlier systems from the 1930s,[2] and quickly spread throughout North America.

The Knife Edge on Capitol Peak in Colorado is an example of a Class 4 climb

The class 5 portion of the class scale is primarily a rock climbing classification system, while classes 1–4 are used for hiking and scrambling.[1] The current definition for each class is:[1]

Class 1
Hiking or running on a trail.
Class 2
Simple scrambling, with the possibility of occasional use of the hands.
Class 3
Scrambling. A rope could be carried.
Class 4
Simple climbing, possibly with exposure. A rope is often used. Falls could be fatal. Natural protection can easily be found.
Class 5
It is considered technical roped free climbing; belaying is used for safety. Un-roped falls can result in severe injury or death.

The American YDS system is the dominant system in North America, and it and the French numerical system are the most dominant systems worldwide; beyond the easiest grades, they can be exactly aligned.[3][4] The exact definition of the classes is somewhat controversial,[5] and updated versions of these classifications have been proposed.[6]

Climbers use class "5" as a prefix, which is then followed by a period (originally a decimal point) and a number that starts at 1 and counts up with increasing difficulty (e.g. 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, etc.).[4] At 5.10, the system adds the letters "a", "b", "c", and "d" as further refinements between levels, and the scale continues upward (e.g. 5.10a, 5.10b, 5.10c, 5.10d, 5.11a, 5.11b, etc.).[1][4]

The American YDS system is an open-ended scale, with the current hardest climb being 5.15d, established by Silence in 2017. Like the French system, the numerical component of the American YDS system is focused on the hardest move on the route.[1]

Protection rating

In 1980, Jim Erickson introduced an additional rating for traditional climbing routes where the level and quality of the climbing protection are assessed.[1] The letter codes chosen were, at the time, identical to the American system for rating the content of movies:[1][3][4]

Code Description
G Good, solid protection.
PG Adequate protection. Falls will not be long
R Inadequate protection: potential for long fall, leader will likely suffer injuries
X Protection is unavailable or so sparse that any fall is likely to result in death or serious injury.

History

See also

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI