2018 United States House of Representatives election in South Dakota

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2018 United States House of Representatives election in South Dakota was held on November 6, to elect the U.S. representative for South Dakota's at-large congressional district. The election coincided with other statewide, legislative, and local elections.

Quick facts Nominee, Party ...
2018 United States House of Representatives election in South Dakota's at-large district

 2016
November 6, 2018 (2018-11-06)
2020 
 
Nominee Dusty Johnson Tim Bjorkman
Party Republican Democratic
Popular vote 202,695 121,033
Percentage 60.33% 36.03%

Johnson:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      >90%
Bjorkman:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%
Tie:      40–50%

U.S. Representative before election

Kristi Noem
Republican

Elected U.S. Representative

Dusty Johnson
Republican

Close

Incumbent Republican U.S. Representative Kristi Noem did not run for a fifth term and instead ran successfully for governor of South Dakota.[1] This was the first open seat election since 2004, and the first time a male candidate was elected since 2002. This was the last U.S. House election in South Dakota until 2024 that a Democrat appeared on the November ballot.

Republican primary

Candidates

Declared

Declined

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin
of error
Dusty
Johnson
Shantel
Krebs
Neal
Tapio
Undecided
Mason-Dixon[6] May 21–23, 2018 625 ± 4.5% 41% 23% 13% 23%
Close

Primary results

Results by county:
  Johnson
  •   30–40%
  •   40–50%
  •   50–60%
  •   60–70%
  Krebs
  •   30–40%
  •   40–50%
  Tapio
  •   30–40%
  •   40–50%
More information Party, Candidate ...
Republican primary results
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Dusty Johnson 47,032 46.8
Republican Shantel Krebs 29,442 29.3
Republican Neal Tapio 23,980 24.0
Total votes 100,454 100
Close

Democratic primary

Candidates

Declared

  • Tim Bjorkman, former circuit court judge[7]

Failed to file

  • Chris Martian, former IT professional[8]

Declined

Libertarian nomination

Candidates

Declared

  • George Hendrickson, former police officer[15][16]

Independents

Candidates

Declined

General election

Predictions

More information Source, Ranking ...
Source Ranking As of
The Cook Political Report[19] Solid R June 1, 2018
The Rothenberg Political Report[20] Solid R June 1, 2018
Sabato's Crystal Ball[21] Safe R June 6, 2018
Close

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin
of error
Dusty
Johnson (R)
Tim
Bjorkman (D)
Other Undecided
Change Research (D)[22] November 2–4, 2018 851 51% 41% 5%[23]
Emerson College[24] November 1–4, 2018 514 ± 4.5% 54% 38% 5%
Mason-Dixon[25] October 18–22, 2018 500 ± 4.5% 54% 31% 3%[26] 12%
Public Opinion Strategies (R-Johnson)[27] August 1–3 & 5, 2018 400 ± 4.9% 54% 33% 10%
Public Policy Polling (D-Bjorkman)[28] July 19–20, 2018 641 ± 3.9% 43% 33% 14%
Close

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
2018 South Dakota's at-large congressional district election[29]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Republican Dusty Johnson 202,695 60.33% −3.77%
Democratic Tim Bjorkman 121,033 36.03% +0.13%
Independent Ron Wieczorek 7,323 2.18% N/A
Libertarian George D. Hendrickson 4,914 1.46% N/A
Total votes 335,965 100.00% N/A
Republican hold
Close

By county

More information County, Dusty Johnson Republican ...
County[29] Dusty Johnson
Republican
Tim Bjorkman
Democratic
Various candidates
Other parties
Margin Total
# % # % # % # %
Aurora 728 57.78% 443 35.16% 89 7.06% 285 22.62% 1,260
Beadle 3,825 63.40% 1,983 32.87% 225 3.73% 1,842 30.53% 6,033
Bennett 604 56.08% 438 40.67% 35 3.25% 166 15.41% 1,077
Bon Homme 1,674 61.75% 940 34.67% 97 3.58% 734 27.07% 2,711
Brookings 6,418 55.08% 4,717 40.48% 518 4.45% 1,701 14.60% 11,653
Brown 8,346 58.61% 5,482 38.50% 411 2.89% 2,864 20.11% 14,239
Brule 1,231 57.98% 814 38.34% 78 3.67% 417 19.64% 2,123
Buffalo 172 32.45% 330 62.26% 28 5.28% -158 -29.81% 530
Butte 2,799 73.97% 836 22.09% 149 3.94% 1,963 51.88% 3,784
Campbell 601 82.90% 108 14.90% 16 2.21% 493 68.00% 725
Charles Mix 2,085 59.07% 1,319 37.37% 126 3.57% 766 21.70% 3,530
Clark 1,150 69.74% 452 27.41% 47 2.85% 698 42.33% 1,649
Clay 1,906 41.37% 2,567 55.72% 134 2.91% -661 -14.35% 4,607
Codington 7,129 67.52% 3,144 29.78% 285 2.70% 3,985 37.74% 10,558
Corson 484 44.61% 557 51.34% 44 4.06% -73 -6.73% 1,085
Custer 2,944 67.25% 1,273 29.08% 161 3.68% 1,671 38.17% 4,378
Davison 4,807 66.30% 2,160 29.79% 283 3.90% 2,647 36.51% 7,250
Day 1,541 56.72% 1,072 39.46% 104 3.83% 469 17.26% 2,717
Deuel 1,272 64.60% 624 31.69% 73 3.71% 648 32.91% 1,969
Dewey 623 34.75% 1,084 60.46% 86 4.80% -461 -25.71% 1,793
Douglas 1,162 77.78% 265 17.74% 67 4.48% 897 60.04% 1,494
Edmunds 1,147 68.07% 488 28.96% 50 2.97% 659 39.11% 1,685
Fall River 2,149 67.51% 882 27.71% 152 4.78% 1,267 39.81% 3,183
Faulk 780 73.24% 255 23.94% 30 2.82% 525 49.30% 1,065
Grant 2,121 66.51% 945 29.63% 123 3.86% 1,176 36.88% 3,189
Gregory 1,484 69.93% 586 27.62% 52 2.45% 898 42.32% 2,122
Haakon 796 84.68% 117 12.45% 27 2.87% 679 72.23% 940
Hamlin 1,939 71.60% 695 25.66% 74 2.73% 1,244 45.94% 2,708
Hand 1,171 71.01% 429 26.02% 49 2.97% 742 45.00% 1,649
Hanson 1,022 64.04% 536 33.58% 38 2.38% 486 30.45% 1,596
Harding 568 83.28% 94 13.78% 20 2.93% 474 69.50% 682
Hughes 5,366 67.43% 2,332 29.30% 260 3.27% 3,034 38.13% 7,958
Hutchinson 2,281 69.76% 883 27.00% 106 3.24% 1,398 42.75% 3,270
Hyde 462 70.75% 164 25.11% 27 4.13% 298 45.64% 653
Jackson 575 59.16% 370 38.07% 27 2.78% 205 21.09% 972
Jerauld 567 62.51% 312 34.40% 28 3.09% 255 28.11% 907
Jones 420 77.49% 94 17.34% 28 5.17% 326 60.15% 542
Kingsbury 1,507 61.97% 855 35.16% 70 2.88% 652 26.81% 2,432
Lake 3,110 60.15% 1,925 37.23% 135 2.61% 1,185 22.92% 5,170
Lawrence 6,868 63.33% 3,489 32.17% 487 4.49% 3,379 31.16% 10,844
Lincoln 15,049 62.69% 8,266 34.43% 690 2.87% 6,783 28.26% 24,005
Lyman 830 60.01% 500 36.15% 53 3.83% 330 23.86% 1,383
Marshall 1,024 52.65% 860 44.22% 61 3.14% 164 8.43% 1,945
McCook 1,373 55.27% 1,047 42.15% 64 2.58% 326 13.12% 2,484
McPherson 798 76.22% 216 20.63% 33 3.15% 582 55.59% 1,047
Meade 7,160 70.60% 2,508 24.73% 474 4.67% 4,652 45.87% 10,142
Mellette 358 51.22% 303 43.35% 38 5.44% 55 7.87% 699
Miner 642 58.42% 413 37.58% 44 4.00% 229 20.84% 1,099
Minnehaha 38,017 54.33% 29,365 41.97% 2,592 3.70% 8,652 12.36% 69,974
Moody 1,622 57.42% 1,090 38.58% 113 4.00% 532 18.83% 2,825
Oglala Lakota 336 11.35% 2,473 83.52% 152 5.13% -2,137 -72.17% 2,961
Pennington 25,433 61.51% 14,092 34.08% 1,821 4.40% 11,341 27.43% 41,346
Perkins 1,064 79.82% 224 16.80% 45 3.38% 840 63.02% 1,333
Potter 923 77.17% 248 20.74% 25 2.09% 675 56.44% 1,196
Roberts 1,915 51.98% 1,664 45.17% 105 2.85% 251 6.81% 3,684
Sanborn 678 66.67% 292 28.71% 47 4.62% 386 37.95% 1,017
Spink 1,736 62.45% 958 34.46% 86 3.09% 778 27.99% 2,780
Stanley 1,042 70.45% 377 25.49% 60 4.06% 665 44.96% 1,479
Sully 613 75.77% 182 22.50% 14 1.73% 431 53.28% 809
Todd 506 23.05% 1,598 72.80% 91 4.15% -1,092 -49.75% 2,195
Tripp 1,814 74.28% 556 22.77% 72 2.95% 1,258 51.52% 2,442
Turner 2,467 64.14% 1,262 32.81% 117 3.04% 1,205 31.33% 3,846
Union 4,282 64.69% 2,152 32.51% 185 2.79% 2,130 32.18% 6,619
Walworth 1,648 73.44% 528 23.53% 68 3.03% 1,120 49.91% 2,244
Yankton 5,191 58.44% 3,383 38.09% 308 3.47% 1,808 20.36% 8,882
Ziebach 340 42.66% 417 52.32% 40 5.02% -77 -9.66% 797
Totals202,69560.33%121,03336.03%12,2373.64%81,66224.31%335,965
Close

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

See also

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI