Draft:ECIPE
Brussels-based think tank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Submission declined on 18 March 2026 by Avgeekamfot (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
| Submission declined on 6 March 2026 by SocDoneLeft (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by SocDoneLeft 12 days ago.
|
| Submission declined on 5 March 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to write articles from scratch.
Declined by ChrysGalley 13 days ago.LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. |
| Submission declined on 6 February 2026 by KeyolTranslater (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by KeyolTranslater 40 days ago.
|
| Submission declined on 23 January 2026 by Idoghor Melody (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Idoghor Melody 54 days ago.
|
Comment: None of the reliable sources linked appear to have substantial coverage of ECIPE, only passing mentions or a quote or two. Please add such sources and resubmit. SocDoneLeft (talk) 15:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment: Too promotional, thanks to LLM usage. Also only about half sourced. ChrysGalley (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment: No sources indicating notability Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 09:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.