Dys4ia
2012 video game
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dys4ia (pronounced "dysphoria") is an abstract, autobiographical Adobe Flash video game that Anna Anthropy, then known as Auntie Pixelante, developed to recount her experiences of gender dysphoria and hormone replacement therapy. The game was originally published on Newgrounds but was later removed by Anthropy. In 2023, the game was republished on itch.io.
| Dys4ia | |
|---|---|
Dys4ia title screen | |
| Publisher | Newgrounds |
| Designer | Anna Anthropy |
| Composer | Liz Ryerson[1] |
| Platform | Adobe Flash |
| Release |
|
| Genre | Autobiography |
| Mode | Single-player |
Gameplay
Touching on the 'frustrations' of transitioning, particularly taking estrogen, the game documents a six-month period in her treatment via a succession of mini-games that reflect on gender politics, identity, and personal development.
Development
Dys4ia was created by independent developer Anna Anthropy. Anthropy created the story as an autobiographical title, intended to convey her experiences with taking estrogen for hormone replacement therapy over a six month period.[2] Gameplay was influenced by the minigame design of WarioWare, with Anthropy designing a "collage of experiences and frustrations" through a sequence of several smaller games.[3] Anthropy developed the game "off and on" over a six-month period.
Anthropy intended the game would help communicate her frustrations around the "systems of oppression" faced by transgender people,[3] although stated that the game was not intended to be an empathy game nor a substitute for completely understanding the transgender experience.[4] Over time, Anthropy expressed dislike for the game's impact, stating it had "eclipsed everything I've done since" and that its misidentification as an empathy game had provided a method "for the previliged to opt out of their responsibilities".[5] In October 2023, Anthropy republished the game on itch.io, accompanied by her reflections that she had struggled with the impact of the game and had once "disowned and disavowed it", but had since reappraised its legacy.[1]
Reception
Several critics praised the game as a deeply personal and autobiographical work. Adam Smith of Rock Paper Shotgun considered the game provided the player with "informative and moving" experiences, and stated the game was "very honest" in its insight into the author's life and decisions, to the point of "extreme discomfort".[6] Similarly, Will Freeman of The Guardian praised the game's "touchy and witting insight" for proving "the power of games to communicate complex concepts through playful interactions".[7]
