Talk:69 (sex position)

That gay picture is gross, yuck 11:39, 12 September 2025 (UTC)11:39, 12 September 2025 (UTC)11:39, 12 September 2025 (UTC)11:39, 12 September 2025 (UTC)11:39, 12 September 2025 (UTC)101.53.217.113 (talk)

Wikipedia is open to the general public, which includes all ages. Wouldn't it make more sense to remove a picture and this inappropriate article by extension? One: this picture is too unacceptable. Two: did it have to be ion color? Couldn't they have used a black-and-white image with such low quality that nobody can understand what's going on? Three: encyclopedias don't normally have pictures. I mean, this is just too much. Pictures of guillotines are fine because they aren't in use. But this? Come on, Wikipedia admins, did you have to allow this picture? If you must keep it, at least replace it with an image what makes it harder to tell what is going on.Primal Groudon (talk) 23:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Primal Groudon, see WP:Not censored and WP:Offensive material. Wikipedia isn't like typical encyclopedias. The drawing is an illustration instead of a real-life image and therefore takes into consideration what WP:Offensive material states about going with the less offensive image. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

But still, the image violates North Korean law. Primal Groudon (talk) 15:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Unless you're one of the Kim family, no one in North Korea has internet. MightyArms (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Then don't look at it. 2604:2D80:DA01:CD00:F879:638:AD2B:805E (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia only follows U.S. law, where its servers are hosted. ~2025-43595-04 (talk) 21:55, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

93.188.100.22 (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

69 Le Parfum {{In 2012 the performer/ perfumer Christopher DiCas, creates with music, a perfume with the name of this position due to the unexpected and uncontrollable eroticism that provocatively radiated and so 69, became the scent with which both sexes are equated erotically; 69 caused mainly because of its name the rage of some conservative societies, and many bad reviews were written before it was even tested. Today it is considered as the elixir that aims to stimulate the relationship and communication of couples for a deeper connection in a modern society that imposes superficiality in all areas.}}

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

93.188.100.22 (talk) 19:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.

Delete the post, Satan commands the opposite. Don't bother with the number to make labels because this is not the number you should be doing this with. 185.173.205.9 (talk) 10:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Why are pictures necessary for this article? What is it about this subject that it cannot be adequately expressed in text alone? Minors in the Harford County Public Schools district accessed this article, and it's is getting media attention. Why does this article need graphic sexual imagery, even if they are illustrations, to convey this information? You want to end up in front of Congress? Because this is how you end up in front of Congress. 70.107.192.191 (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

WP:CENSOR. And, basically, there's no law against displaying those images. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:11, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Honestly any svx position should either be deleted or at least somehow censored cause minors use Wikipedia, and this is inappropriate Gfroi (talk) 13:58, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

"The concept is that both partners can experience sexual stimulation and oral sensation simultaneously, but this can also distract those who try to focus solely on their own pleasure from giving oral sex well."

It's also possible to use the position while only one partner is being active at a time, and the other gets to enjoy the view and intimate smells, which makes for a better connection than other oral sex positions. Seems like that concept is not really in the article. Jules TH 16 (talk) 12:11, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Seriously, why do you need to put images in this article, there are plenty of minors using Wikipedia and seeing this page Macron le macaron (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2026 (UTC)