Talk:Al Jazeera English
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Al Jazeera English article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Are we even pretending to be neutral at this point?
|
Compare this article with the article on the ADL. In the ADL article, its pro-Israel advocacy is mentioned in the lede, and a huge chunk of the article is dedicated to criticism of its pro-Israel stance. In the Al Jazeera article, its pro-Palestinian advocacy - which constitutes a similarly central focus for the network as pro-Israel advocacy is for the ADL - is never even mentioned in the article; not even once. pro-Palestinian/anti-Israel misinformation published by AJA and later retracted (or kept) is well-documented, as is its strong pro-Palestinian bias. In fact, pro-Palestinian advocacy is arguably what AJA is best known for by the general public. Not a word on any this on this article. Is anyone actually convinced that we're covering the two very comparable organisations neutrally? MeaningBasedOntology (talk) 16:28, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
|
