Talk:Bad Piggies

i believe that Bad Piggies should be of High Importance because it's not obscure — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jowee the Raposa (talk • contribs) 05:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

 Not done@Jowee the Raposa: - The game is not notable enough for it to be High-Importance. --Anarchyte 11:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bad Piggies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121021232736/http://www.rovio.com:80/en/news/blog/217/rovio-to-launch-bad-piggies-on-september-27 to http://www.rovio.com/en/news/blog/217/rovio-to-launch-bad-piggies-on-september-27

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

The link to the official website now just leads to an HTTP 404. I want to add an archived version of it from the Wayback Machine, but I don't know which date and time it should be from. 1isall (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 21:35, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

• This game is a part of my childhood, happy to see it at GAN. Cos ^{(X + Z)} Happy quarter century Wikipedia! 21:35, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bad Piggies/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.