Talk:Bhumihar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bhumihar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Still Showing failed verification
@Slatersteven @Ekdalian @Sitush 103.88.57.46 (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- We normaly leave Tags unactioned for longer than a few weeks to give editors time to fix the issue. Slatersteven (talk) 10:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Why Legal documents are not considerable here can anyone explain it what if India country judiciary supreme court even Accepts them as Bhumihar Brahmans
Can Anyone explain? 103.88.57.46 (talk) 20:32, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- IP editors are not supposed to discuss about caste related articles; you need extended confirmed right for editing or for any sort of discussion regarding the same as per the new rules on contentious topics (caste)! You can only post edit request for this article, no discussion! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 07:47, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Misinterpretation of sources to run personal narratives.
The article is filled with multiple statements where only selective portions of sourced reference are used to offer a manufactered narrative, and even secondary literature are given as reference where primary sources are available with full context. However, I understand there is no point in awaking someone pretending to be asleep.
Coming to the point, in the article provided as source to declare ,
In that article (the Hindi one), it is clear that it is the boy that he is referring to is calling himself a Bhumihar Brahman and Ravish Kumar has only, written his statement in direct speech. With this being obvious, Ravish Kumar has no where used the Bhumihar Brahman identity for himself.
- See wp:agf and wp:or. Slatersteven (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- please correct these mistakes on bhumihar this is spreading a lot of misinformation ~2026-15979-27 (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Please proved a source. Slatersteven (talk) 18:23, 13 March 2026 (UTC)