Talk:Black International

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:42, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

International Working People's Association → Black International – Unfortunately, this organization is little known and rarely discussed in scientific publications. However, it seems to me that adopting the title Black International is clearer, as the current designation refers only to a terminology that appeared late in the organization's history and was localized to the USA. When examining the intentions of the London delegates and their decisions, it is clear that their choice was to retain the terminology International Workingmen's Association (the same as the First International and the Anti-Authoritarian International). Since a distinction must nevertheless be made between the three organizations, and one should probably be established for the Marxist International (1872–1876) as well, I believe the best approach is to shift to Black International, while initially keeping the term chosen by the organization (IWA) in the introduction (as I have just done). Aristoxène (talk) 21:58, 8 May 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:05, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

I have no interest in requesting this move anymore, as I left the editing of the page. Do as you wish is best. Aristoxène (talk) 09:53, 13 May 2026 (UTC)