Talk:Brendan Carr
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Brendan Carr has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 28, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brendan Carr article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 23 May 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Brendan Carr (lawyer) to Brendan Carr. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Repeated removal of information
77.22.168.12, this source explicitly says that "Carr has made it clear that he wants the FCC to punish news broadcasters that he perceives as being unfair to Trump or Republicans in general". You allege a violation of NPOV. Could you care to elaborate? BootsED (talk) 23:17, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Actually, another used removed it (I didn't understand why, either). See diff link - 77.22.168.12 (talk) 23:18, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 23 May 2025
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Brendan Carr (lawyer) → Brendan Carr – Previous pagemove was reverted. Lawyer is undoubtedly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC with respect to long-term significance (chair of the FCC), mentions in news/independent reliable sources, as well as pageviews (note that the pageviews of the main "Brendan Carr" article in the last month were also about the lawyer). Hatnotes are sufficient to disambiguate the other subjects with the same name. Wikipedical (talk) 21:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 09:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Law has been notified of this discussion. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 09:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support based on pageview stats and Google search results that trend towards the attorney. wizzito | say hello! 19:18, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Suspension of Kimmel's show mentioned elsewhere
This article is mentioned here re: suspension of Kimmel's show:
--David Tornheim (talk) 00:36, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 September 2025
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Brendan Carr is a terrier breed, his owner/handler states he belongs to the Trump family. He was recently nominated for
"Best of Show" 2600:8803:7516:B00:3600:A558:7B4E:A448 (talk) 10:40, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Charliehdb (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Brendan Carr/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: ElijahPepe (talk · contribs) 21:28, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 21:19, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
I will be reviewing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 21:19, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- Subject is notable, based on what I find in Google, Google News, Google Books, Google Scholar, HeinOnline, Emerald Insight, Project MUSE, Sage Journals, EBSCO, and Gale. Good article nominator is the top contributor in authorship. There appear to be no copyright violations or plagiarism. There are no ongoing edit wars. Images are appropriate for the article and have tags for public domain or Creative Commons licenses in Wikimedia Commons. Article appears to present viewpoints neutrally and attribute opinions. Therefore, the following criteria are met so far. Spelling and grammar appear correct. The article is broad in coverage. Therefore, the following criteria are met so far.
- Well-written
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
- Broad in its coverage
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
- media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
- Well-written
- A review about verifiability will be forthcoming. Z. Patterson (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- @ElijahPepe: All of the sources in the references are reliable. I have some points to address.
- I see no mention of the Columbus School of Law in the cited source for this sentence. Beizer advised Carr to attend the Catholic University of America's Columbus School of Law and earn a telecommunications certificate. Are you able to find a source that specifically mentions this school?
- Can you find a different source to support this sentence? I do not see it in the source it cites. As early as 2020, Carr was believed to be a possible successor to chairman Ajit Pai.
- I do not see the term "Orwellian" in this source: Lima-Strong, Cristiano (October 10, 2022). "PayPal faces backlash after floating fines for sharing misinformation". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 31, 2025. Can you find a different source that mentions "Orwellian" or paraphrase or summarize what you see?
- If you make these three changes, I will pass the article. I am impressed at the quality of the article now. I will give you seven days to address these. Z. Patterson (talk) 04:58, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Z. Patterson: On the first point, the source says, "Beizer took Carr under his wing, advising him to attend law school at nearby Catholic University of America and to enroll in the school’s telecom certificate program." On the second, the source says, "The GOP calls got rhetorical support Wednesday night from FCC member Brendan Carr, a Republican who some see as a potential future chairman of the agency." On the third, that claim is cited to a tweet embedded in the page in which Carr says "Orwellian". elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:11, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- @ElijahPepe: I understand now. Thank you. The article also meets these criteria.
- Verifiable with no original research
- it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- it contains no original research
- it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
- Verifiable with no original research
- I am passing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 11:46, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- @ElijahPepe: I understand now. Thank you. The article also meets these criteria.
- @Z. Patterson: On the first point, the source says, "Beizer took Carr under his wing, advising him to attend law school at nearby Catholic University of America and to enroll in the school’s telecom certificate program." On the second, the source says, "The GOP calls got rhetorical support Wednesday night from FCC member Brendan Carr, a Republican who some see as a potential future chairman of the agency." On the third, that claim is cited to a tweet embedded in the page in which Carr says "Orwellian". elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:11, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- @ElijahPepe: All of the sources in the references are reliable. I have some points to address.