Talk:Bronx Conservative Party

I have added additional sources to support the content. I am attempting to show a correlation between the candidates running and the political party involved. While the party operates locally, it is part of a larger organizational structure. I believe the candidates and the party go hand-in-hand, as their platforms, endorsements, and affiliations are closely aligned. This connection is relevant to understanding the political context.

Any help would be appreciated. EliTfab01 (talk) 19:03, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Two of the three New York Times articles do not cover the Bronx Conservative Party at all; the 2nd NYT ref provides only trivial coverage. The others are either not indpendent or via local press. (The Daily News is a valid source, but it's behind a paywall, and even if it's 100% about the Bronx Conservative Party, it, on its own, does not establish notability. JSFarman (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: This article is largely based on a couple of primary sources and reporting from the local newspaper Bronx Times-Reporter, most of which seems fairly routine. I believe the references here do not establish notability, and better coverage will be required from a wider range of independent publications. MediaKyle (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: This is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.
  It is impossible to provide a review until you have finalised your referencing. This is WP:BOMBARD, whcih generally signifies an advertisement 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:23, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: is the only source with WP:SIGCOV ~Kvng (talk) 19:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I have updated the citations by removing references from local media outlets that may be considered questionable. I retained MeidasTouch News because I believe it contributes to presenting a fuller picture of the subject while maintaining balance, particularly in relation to controversy. The source also allows the statement to be challenged or reviewed if necessary. EliTfab01 (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)