In the Criticism section, non-replicability of her researches has been
written using references 22 and 23; and following them is another line
claiming replicability of her researches citing references 24 and 25. I
came here as a reader to know about Carol Dweck; not for the purpose of
editing. But, these two lines claiming totally opposite have confused
me. I guess it will confuse most other readers too. Can somebody who is
more familiar with all these references help explain to the reader more
clearly?
Together with this, I have another question popping in my mind regarding
these kind of opposite references? Typically, how can wikipedians
usually decide which references to take? Is there any rule-of-thumb to
follow? I hope this answer will help me in editing future wikipedia posts.
Dhawell.hlugalay (talk) 04:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
I have seen some edits recently in this section on 30-Jun-2020. Now, reference 23 has disappeared and replaced by 22 in its place.
Now, reference 24 became 23 (now mentioned as Psychological Science Journal) and 25 became 24(now mentioned as Nature Journal).
So, I'm assuming some editor are trying to make it clear quietly. But, still overall issue is not resolved yet.
Now, it's 22 against "23 and 24". We still don't know who is right.
Dhawell.hlugalay (talk) 10:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)