Talk:Classicide
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Classicide article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that an image or photograph of Classicide be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Fred Schwarz and OR
Mann clearly described classicide as a "neologism" that was introduced by him. He does not mention Schwartz, and he writes
- "I add my own coined term, "classicide"...". (p. 17)
I am going to move Schwartz to a footnote, for his notability is highly questionable. Paul Siebert (talk) 21:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC)


