Talk:Confusion agent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | The content of the Confusion agent page was merged into Espionage#Confusion agent on 4 August 2025. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Proposed merge of Espionage with Confusion agent
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To merge Confusion agent into Espionage or Sabotage or a future Intelligence article for 'short text, context and overlap'. Klbrain (talk) 11:26, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Doesn’t meet WP:N for a standalone article DankPedia (talk) 18:36, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Well if we're going to merge these it should surely be the other way around... I would strongly, strongly opposing merging it this direction. The other way I would agree. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:38, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, incorrect tag was added DankPedia (talk) 18:53, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Then I support it. Really, merging would amount to adding the 1 source to the mention of confusion agent already in the article. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Do Not Support. Confusion agents are Sabotage agents, and not Espionage agents. Espionage officers and agents are in the business of gathering intelligence. Confusion agents are not at all in this business. Guylaen (talk) 22:34, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- DankPedia, I think this might be cleared up when I finish my creation of Intelligence (field) and Intelligence (information). Because espionage and intelligence are not synonyms.
- But I am in the middle of finals right now. Guylaen (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Do Not Support. Confusion agents are Sabotage agents, and not Espionage agents. Espionage officers and agents are in the business of gathering intelligence. Confusion agents are not at all in this business. Guylaen (talk) 22:34, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Then I support it. Really, merging would amount to adding the 1 source to the mention of confusion agent already in the article. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, incorrect tag was added DankPedia (talk) 18:53, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support merge to either or both targets (Espionage or Sabotage). This doesn't seem to be a widely covered topic on its own. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 21:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Proposed merge of Confusion agent with Sabotage
Confusion agents conduct Sabotage against Counterintelligence officers and Espionage agents. Guylaen (talk) 14:44, 19 May 2025 (UTC)