Talk:Edward Ruscha

I have replaced the word "printmaker" with "photographer." I have studied Ruscha before, and as far as I know he has never been a prominent printmaker, though he has made lithographs before. Next to his occupation as a painter, he is most famous for his works as a photographer. As such, i have replaced "printmaker" with "photographer." Feel free to change it back, if you know otherwise.

Actually, as a printmaker, I knew of his screen prints. In particular, as a printmaker, he was known for how he used rainbow rolls. Even a quick Google image search of his name initially turns up "Standard Station", a screen print that happens to be one of his most prominent pieces of work. Printmaking was important to many pop-artists with Ruscha included. I wouldn't limit it to just lithography and insert "printmaker" again without replacing photography since he worked in all those media. His paintings and photography might be more famous, but his printmaking work was important and the fact that he was a printmaker shouldn't be removed in place for any of it.--76.215.17.251 03:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I feel that a more accurate discussion of his work is needed. There are several errors in the one already up. PRIOR to the 1980s, Ruscha was already working with dried vegetable and other various organic pigments. Moreover, his incorporation of a motif of shadowed rays of light also appeared way before the 1980s. If i have more time, I will write up something. Other ideas or input is appreciated. 21:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Edruscha.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://hdl.handle.net/10020/cifa2012m1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 20:32, 14 January 2014 (UTC)