Talk:FC Armavir

It has been proposed in this section that FC Armavir be renamed and moved to FC Armavir (Russia). A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

FC Armavir → FC Armavir (Russia) – There is also FC Armavir (Armenia), and no clear primary topic exists. ~2026-23545-84 (talk) 23:59, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Football has been notified of this discussion. ScalarFactor (talk) 00:44, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 13:14, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Support - no PRIMARYTOPIC, so move and create dab page at base. GiantSnowman 13:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Support per nom. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 21:07, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
• Support – Per above. Svartner (talk) 03:18, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
• Weak oppose Given WP:TWODABS, I hoped that one of the clubs would be reasonable for the base title. Since they're of similar ages and were both apparently defunct, I thought that wouldn't be the case, but I ran the Russian club article through Google Translate and read "On June 3, 2023, the club successfully completed the licensing process for Division B of the 2nd League." Favoring an existing club over a defunct one would make sense here.

If there's consensus to move, however, I strongly recommend redirecting the current title to Armavir#Other uses instead of creating a new, two-entry disambiguation page. --BDD (talk) 00:51, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

• Support per nom and redirect FC Armavir to Armavir. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:58, 20 April 2026 (UTC)