Talk:GDevelop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| The content of Draft:GDevelop was merged into GDevelop on 08/18/2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2020. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge Details
Content has been merged from Draft:GDevelop per conversation found at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GDevelop#GDevelop. This was to ensure more detailed content about the engine is added from the draft, but the original live article and references are maintained.Trayal (talk) 02:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Cons?
Maybe someone should add cons of GDevelop to this page to keep it from seeming like an advertisement. --ChocolateCircus445 (talk) 15:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- @ChocolateCircus445: It does seem kind of like an advertisement. I don't know if cons are necessary (unless you had some sources in mind that talk about cons?). But I wonder if maybe it would help to cut down on how much is written about it's features - it kind of reads like a catalog for a product right now, and I'm not sure if all of that info is really necessary for an encyclopedia article. - Whisperjanes (talk) 19:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- I think I'll do that. GeneralFailur (talk) 23:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is that it's hard to just add in bad things, there's no pro/con chart. Also, the point is to talk about the features. GeneralFailur (talk) 23:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
