Talk:Grogu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grogu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Grogu has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | Grogu is part of the Characters from The Mandalorian series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 27, 2019. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that "Baby Yoda", a character in the Star Wars spin-off The Mandalorian, was named "2019's biggest new character" by The Guardian? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Needs more about the character
Currently this article is about the technology of presenting the character and the status of its merchandising; can anyone add information about the character itself from the show? How/where it appears in the setting, plot, etc? I haven't seen the show but would appreciate some in-world context. Her Pegship (I'm listening) 18:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Grogu was raised in Coruscant hidden from the Empire inside the Jedi Temple. After the Clone Wars, Grogu was taken from Coruscant and traded for his high Midiclorian count. A valuable asset for the New Order and the creation of Snoke and Palpatines' survival and nefarious Sith plans. MasterJoeyJedi (talk) 05:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 December 2019
 | This edit request to The Child (Star Wars) has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Current Line that needs to be fixed: At one point, the Mudhorn charges at the Child in his floating 'crib', but the Mandalorian uses his grappling hook-and-wire to pull the Child to safety.
Discussion: Unless my memory is incorrect, the character does not use the grappling hook-and-wire in this scene. He instead, as occurs in other scenes, uses the remote control for the basket/prim/crib to issue a quick reposition command. 146.115.44.88 (talk) 20:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Not doubting your claim, but we don't take personal opinions. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- I believe that the episode itself is considered a reliable source for claims about on-screen events in that episode. I recently re-watched it, and IP is correct. —VeryRarelyStable (talk) 12:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Storylines
Move to "Baby Yoda"?
Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2020
Reviewer: TheJoebro64 (talk · contribs) 14:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Child (Star Wars)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Baby Jabba is cuter, if you ask me. JOEBRO64 14:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- TheJoebro64 To each their own! LOL Thanks for taking on the review... — Hunter Kahn 19:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Lede
- "The Child... is a
fictionalcharacter..." Alrighty, first things first: IMO, "fictional" is redundant. A character is, by definition, fictional. Even if they're based on a real person (like Creed Bratton), they're fictionalized to at least some extent. And even if we ignore that, no one is going to think a tiny green alien who appears in a TV series is an actual, living organism. - "... with whom he shares a
similarlystrong ability withThethe Force." "Similarly" is implied by "shares". Also, the definitive article of "the Force" is not part of the concept's title, so it shouldn't be capitalized. - "The Child and the Mandalorian are the only
twocharacters who..." - "The Child has received an
overwhelminglypositive reception..." I don't doubt that it was overwhelming, but two things here: first, modifiers are generally unnecessary, and second, "overwhelmingly" could potentially be considered WP:POV. I don't think you'll lose anything by chopping it; after all, the reader is informed right there he's the show's breakout character. - "The Hollywood Reporter
has claimedsaid the character..." "Claim is a word to avoid, since it's a loaded term and can call the credibility of the person/publication into question.
- I don't disagree with any of these, so I've gone ahead and implemented the changes, and removed a few other instances of "claimed" in the article, as well as another use of "overwhelmingly" in the Reception section. — Hunter Kahn 01:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Appearances
- I would link Yoda's species at "the same alien species" in the first sentence of the section, given that it's done in the lede.
- "As of the end of Season 1..." I'm not sure about this, since I'm not really used to writing articles about television, but should you say "the first season" instead of "Season 1"? I wouldn't think "Season" should be a proper noun, and MOS:SPELL09 recommends spelling out 0–9 in words.
- "... the Mandalorian protects him and instead shoots and
killsdestroys IG-11." Missing a period. Also, I'm not sure "kills" is the best word to use here because IG-11 is a robot. Plus, he comes back a few episodes later, so it could potentially confuse readers when he's suddenly re-introduced in the section. - No other comments here, generally well written.
- Thanks TheJoebro64. I've made edits based upon the suggestions above. — Hunter Kahn 13:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I don't see the point in providing detailed plot summaries of each episode The Child appears in. That seems redundant for each episode's own article. --ZimZalaBim talk 14:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- I tried to limit the descriptions to the specific roles The Child played in each episode, not provide a synopsis of the episodes themselves. — Hunter Kahn 03:14, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Characterization
- "Physically, the Child
veryclosely resembles Yoda..." "Substitute 'damn' every time you're inclined to write 'very'; your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be." - Mark Twain - "...
withsharing hissamesignature green skin and long, pointed ears." - "Kevin Melrose of
Comic Book ResourcesCBR.com noted..." This one is completely up to you, but the name of the website changed some time ago to just CBR.com (the article still resides at "Comic Book Resources" because of WP:COMMONNAME).
Concept and creation
- "The Child was conceived
and createdby Jon Favreau..." I personally think "created" is unnecessary because conceived sort of means the same thing. Also, it removes some repetition because afterward comes "... the creator and showrunner of The Mandalorian." - The "the" in "the Walt Disney Company" should not be capitalized.
- "When CGI is
utilizedused..." This is another one that's up to you, but IMO "utilize" is almost always redundant to another, simpler verb.- Accepted your suggested wording. Thanks TheJoebro64! — Hunter Kahn 14:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- The only real comment I have about the Filming section is if "When this story was later told to the public, some media reports mistakenly described it as if the producers of The Mandalorian were entirely replacing the Child puppet with a CGI creation until Herzog convinced them otherwise" is truly necessary. I don't see how a somewhat minor story that ended up not being true is beneficial to understanding filming, as it's pretty clear that was never the case.
- Also, Adam Pally and Instagram aren't linked in the Filming section even though it's the first (and as far as I can tell, only) mention of them in the article.
- "Pally punched the animatronic Child puppet
veryhard..." - Another minor thing that I've noticed around the article is that "internet" is capitalized. While this is purely stylistic and I don't think strongly, "internet" isn't really considered a proper noun anymore, so I personally think all uses should be de-capitalized. (I think it's also worth noting that people capitalized things like "telephone" and "phonograph" when they first came out, too.)
- The Walt Disney Company should be unlinked in the Prerelease section, per WP:OLINK.
Themes
- "... before the Mandalorian intervene
ds." - I would add a link to Dark Side of the Force at "... that ability has been most commonly associated with the Dark Side of the Force..." I know the Force is linked earlier, but we haven't talked about the concept of the light/dark sides until now, which could potentially be confusing for someone who isn't familiar with Star Wars.
- "... the Child uses the Force to heal..."
- No other comments here.
Cultural impact
- My main problem with the "Critical reception" section is that it's essentially a bullet list of opinions that's been converted to prose. This is the "A said B" problem (see the essay WP:RECEPTION about this). This isn't a huge problem and if you disagree you needn't alter it too much, but there should at least be a sense of organization and cohesion. Here are some tips to help (a lot of these are present at WP:RECEPTION, but I'll list the most important points):
- Group related opinions.
- Paraphrase quotations, and don't rely on too many direct quotes.
- Vary sentence rhythm.
- Hey TheJoebro64, just wanted to let you know I haven't forgotten about this and I'm not ignoring it, just got sidetracked by some real-life stuff, but I will try to get to it and your other comments very soon. — Hunter Kahn 21:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hunter Kahn, no problem. Take your time. JOEBRO64 21:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- I took a shot at revising this section a bit. I didn't blow it up altogether and start from scratch, but rather tried to rework it and reorder it so it was less of a collection of quotes. I tried instead to group related opinions and focus on specific ideas/themes that stemmed from the critical reception; the Child as a pop culture phenomenon, contributing to Disney+'s success, making Star Wars more relevant for a wider audience, what it means for the future of puppetry and animatronics, etc. etc. I also scaled back on direct quotations and added more paraphrasing. Let me know if you think it needs more work. — Hunter Kahn 21:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hunter Kahn, no problem. Take your time. JOEBRO64 21:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- "comparing him to the Porgs from Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017)
,and Baby Groot from..." - "wrote that the character is "so lovable that its lovability..."
- "Another popular meme
utilizedused..." - I think the "Cultural references" section might benefit from a mention of how other companies have tried introducing "baby" versions of characters seemingly to cash in on the Child's popularity. For instance, this Verge article mentions how Baby Sonic from the Sonic movie "feels like something ripped out of Disney's playbook — taking a beloved character and making it a baby."
- "... will include a small figurine of the Child."
References
- Ref. 20: Remove the greater-than sign in the last name parameter.
- Refs. 41, 50: This is from Forbes' contributors section, which doesn't have as much editorial oversight as the salaried-staff section. This shouldn't be too much of a problem, but I do think we need to double-check that the author of the article (Erik Kain) has credentials.
- Ref. 42: The Niner Times is a student-run newspaper, so I don't think it'd classify as a reliable source.
- Refs. 75, 84, 105, 175: The "B" in ComicBook.com should be capitalized.
- Ref. 89: Vulture is missing a link.
- Ref. 106: Same as I said about the other Forbes ref.
- Ref. 112: Fix link formatting issue in the website parameter.
- Ref. 122: What makes TVweb a reliable source?
- Ref. 139, 189: Metro is an unreliable source, according to WP:RS/P.
- Refs. 154, 159: What makes Junkee a reliable source?
- I believe I've addressed each of the above; I made the fixes requested, and removes all the sources flagged as unreliable or questionable. Almost all citations I removed were used in combination with other citations to reinforce various facts, so removing them didn't require me to drop any content, with the exception of one fairly inconsequential sentence about Elisabeth Moss commenting on Baby Yoda. As for the Forbes writers, based on their body of work and other info I've seen online about them, it seems to me they are OK to cite in this story; I might have more pause if this were a complicated or controversial topic, but for a pop culture topic like this I'm less concerned. But let me know if you disagree. — Hunter Kahn 13:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Misc.
- None
Just to clarify, my review will mostly focus on tightening up the prose and if the cited sources are reliable. Since it's a big article, I'll spot-check a few references to make sure nothing is being misrepresented, but I'm assuming good faith so I'm not expecting anything significant. JOEBRO64 21:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry again for the delay in finishing this one, TheJoebro64. My wife had a death in the family due to COVID-19, so I haven't had much wiki-time recently. But I expect to wrap up the remaining comments no later than tomorrow. I appreciate your patience! — Hunter Kahn 21:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hunter Kahn, oh gosh, I'm so sorry. My condolences. JOEBRO64 22:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hey TheJoebro64. Thanks for bearing with me. I believe I've now addressed everything, though if anything warrants any follow-up questions or remarks, I'm happy to address them. I appreciate your patience! — Hunter Kahn 21:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hunter Kahn, everything looks good. Passing. JOEBRO64 22:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hunter Kahn, oh gosh, I'm so sorry. My condolences. JOEBRO64 22:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
