Talk:Gunhild of Wenden

I see no reason to remove an informative cross-reference of this type from the top of any article:

Sources indicate that this may have been the same person as Sigrid the Haughty.

Restored. SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:40, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

This is not what hatnotes are for. Removed again. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Response to third opinion request:

Hatnotes are indeed not to make controversial claims. I agree that the hatnote should stay removed. I do think the claim should be done in the text, in a NPOV way, with RS references.—OpenFuture (talk) 20:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Källor tyder på att det här kan röra sig om samma person som Swiatoslawa av Polen. was added below the Swedish link.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

As no pictures of this woman apparently exist, it would improve the article if someone created a drawing of what she may have looked like based on period clothing and any descriptions available. Asarelah (talk) 14:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, it's a no-no. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 07:48, 2 September 2014 (UTC)