Talk:Helen King (classicist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biography assessment rating comment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 02:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
heading problem
Because the heading for this article is DR HELEN KING it does not show up in the search when you press Go for HELEN KING. I suppose that the DR should be deleted from the heading so that it just reads HELEN KING. Of course there is another Helen King, the actress, so there will need to be two entries for the name Helen King.
Notability
I'm going bold and removing the notability citation. My main reason, naturally, is that I myself went looking for this Helen King on WIkipedia. She has written several books of enduring merit, as well as numerous articles over a period of years. I would also suggest that it is rather anti-intellectual to exclude scholars who are eminent in their fields while including hosts of pages on not only minor television actors, but minor characters on short-lived series. This is not an elitist argument: I don't think those articles should be deleted, and those characters touched thousands or millions of minds. It's just that I think it's better to err on the side of inclusiveness. I am linking to this article because I'm quoting King in another article, and I want potential readers to be able to ask "So who is this?" Which is not to say that the article itself is satisfactory; I express no opinion about that. Cynwolfe (talk) 02:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
