Wikiwand AI

Talk:Homestar Runner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Former good articleHomestar Runner was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 4, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 12, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 17, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 16, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
Close
More information WikiProject Internet culture To-do: ...
Close

"ʎɥsoןs" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect ʎɥsoןs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 3 § ʎɥsoןs until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 17:32, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Revisions for tone and citation issues

Hello! I plan to revise this article for its tone (particularly the history section, which is written more like a biography of the creators than a description of the site/show) and to add external citations where possible to resolve the primary sourcing issue. Will also seek out more recent sources and update as appropriate. Revisions will be an example for my first-year writing students, who are working on their own articles. Suggestions & guidance welcome. PracticalShoebill (talk) 17:35, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Revisions regarding my article

Hi! I plan on adding citations, as my article lacks a lot of needed citations. I also plan on revising the way the article describes the plot overview as it does not flow very well nor make a lot of sense. I also plan on removing some wording, and adding that the book is a FALSE retelling, with not being historically accurate and should not be used as an academic source. NOCTIPHANI (talk) 16:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks