Talk:Jamie Margolin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
image
"These should still be decided on a case-by-case basis, based on an actual analysis rather than simply "they're bad"." you do not have a broad consensus, or policy basis, to remove images. please discuss before unilaterally removing reliable sourced content. --Turktimex3 (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Controversies
Looks like this section is under attack by several unverified users: DubbSteps420, Pinetree27 and Citizen Kane 3 B. I was accused by ToBeFree of "continu[ing] to restor[e] the disputed material" then ToBeFree threatened to block me from editing pages. Shall we have a consensus as to whether this topic shall be included rather than threatening people? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReidLark1n (talk • contribs) 23:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- To ensure that these concerns are noticed by experienced users, I have added a section at WP:BLPN#Jamie_Margolin pointing here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Here are some articles which at least form the foundation for discussion:
- https://nyunews.com/news/2021/10/20/jamie-margolin-emma-tang-sexual-assault-allegations/
- https://www.yahoo.com/video/aapi-activist-climate-activist-accuse-230055269.html
- https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=kkKx9zgobOECUysUF5dmfA== ReidLark1n (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't really want to get involved in this, but I did notice that there was a source in the paragraph prior to its removal, so that is worth mentioning. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- The accusation verifiably happened. There is a court document cited. The question is whether the topic is covered by § Public figures. ReidLark1n (talk) 23:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- It also appears that User:Citizen Kane 3 B, the user who removed the disputed content, has now been CU blocked by Materialscientist. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 23:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Make that all three of them. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 23:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Details about the CU blocks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- The accusation verifiably happened. There is a court document cited. The question is whether the topic is covered by § Public figures. ReidLark1n (talk) 23:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see a single usable source for a BLP. Court Documents are not usable, NYU is a college student, not a bonafide journalist and Yahoo is apparently an editorial from NextShark who has no actual identifiable editorial controls. Slywriter (talk) 01:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- That is interesting instead. I do believe this BLP loophole allows public figures to evade otherwise accurate reporting from primary sources and secondary sources that fall short of a level of notoriety New York Times, etc. Se La Vie. ReidLark1n (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- or re-affirms that we are not a WP:TABLOID and not everything that happens is documented in Wikipedia. As we have WP:NODEADLINE, we can patiently wait for sources to catch up.. or not. Slywriter (talk) 23:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- That is interesting instead. I do believe this BLP loophole allows public figures to evade otherwise accurate reporting from primary sources and secondary sources that fall short of a level of notoriety New York Times, etc. Se La Vie. ReidLark1n (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't really want to get involved in this, but I did notice that there was a source in the paragraph prior to its removal, so that is worth mentioning. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Consensus should have been gained before this was reinserted. Where was this consensus given the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive348#Jamie Margolin discussion? Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ask Czello who changed the wording. ReidLark1n 16:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)