Talk:Laughing Jacobs Creek
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Laughing Jacobs Creek has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 15, 2026. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Laughing Jacobs Creek was reportedly named after an early settler's attempt to make a loon call? | ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vermont (talk) 05:08, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- ... that Laughing Jacobs Creek was reportedly named after an early settler's attempt to make a loon call?
- Source: Hitchman, Robert (1985). Place Names of Washington. Washington State Historical Society. ISBN 9780917048579., p. 158 It was reportedly named by 2 early settlers, William Bush and Wilford Stewart, when they heard another settler, named Jacobs, trying to imitate a loon’s cry on the lake.
Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:22, 27 May 2026 (UTC).
- I'll review this, though I'm not sure I can finish today. ミラP@Miraclepine 14:15, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Created three days before nom, size 4649 B. Hook is insane and might as well this page make WP:UNUSUAL. After making minor fixes per V, not much to say. ミラP@Miraclepine 00:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Laughing Jacobs Creek/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 07:51, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Whonting (talk · contribs) 09:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi Generalissima, I will review this for the good article drive.
General comments
- The lead is really well written and a pleasure to read, well done on presenting the facts in such an engaging manner.
- "in the city of Sammamish, It originates from the 7.4-acre" not sure if "It" was meant to be lowercase or the start of a new sentence
- Fixed/-G
Sources
All sources are adequately reliable for the facts they are supporting.
Close paraphrasing:
- (article) "was reportedly named after two early American settlers overheard a settler named Jacobs attempting to imitate a loon call at the lake" vs (source) "was reportedly named by 2 early settlers, William Bush and Wilford Stewart, when they heard another settler, named Jacobs, trying to imitate a loon's cry on the lake."
- Noting here that these are quite close, but it is short and difficult to paraphrase, and I believe it falls on the correct side of WP:LIMITED (even if I am not an expert at CLOP).
- (article) "Cutthroat trout are found throughout the Laughing Jacobs basin, and Coho salmon are known to use the lower portions of the stream." vs (source) "Cutthroat trout are found more or less throughout the basin, and coho and kokanee salmon are known to use lower Laughing Jacobs Creek."
- I think this does fall into close paraphrasing.
- Rephrased.-G
- I think this does fall into close paraphrasing.
Spot check:
- [2][3][4a]
Some points here: the narrow ravine being in the city of Issaquah is discussed in the Herrera and Amec sources. The Herrera source says
- "It drains a basin area of approximately 3,600 acres with headwaters on the Sammamish Plateau within the City of Sammamish before descending into the City of Issaquah through a steep ravine." - this is ambiguous whether the ravine is in which city
- and the Amec source says
- "The upper portion of the watershed is within the City of Sammamish and lower portion is within the City of Issaquah. In the upper watershed, the creek flows through residential neighborhoods, down a forested canyon into Hans Jensen State Park." - this talks about the narrow ravine ("forested canyon") as being part of the upper portion, within the City of Sammamish.
- Good point; rephrased.-G
- "The upper portion of the watershed is within the City of Sammamish and lower portion is within the City of Issaquah. In the upper watershed, the creek flows through residential neighborhoods, down a forested canyon into Hans Jensen State Park." - this talks about the narrow ravine ("forested canyon") as being part of the upper portion, within the City of Sammamish.
- Was the 4 feet wide culvert described in Amec replaced later with the 6 feet wide one described in Herrera?
- I can't seem to find a definite answer here. You're right 6 ft seems to be the more modern figure.-G
- Can you quote the material supporting the waterfall comments?
- Oops, thats from William & Phinney. Cited. An impassable falls exists in the steep ravine approximately 0.5 mile upstream of the mouth -G
- [7]

- [12][14]
Putting these together as I'm a little iffy on describing the area around the Parkway as the creek's mouth (which is relevant for the location of the alluvial fan and the blackberry thickets), but I will defer to what makes sense to you.
- Rephrased/-G
Suggestions
- Place Names of Washington is accessible via the Internet Archive if you would like to add it
- Done.-G
- Drainage area can link to Drainage basin.
- Done.-G
Other
- Images
both good. I see the USFWS uploaded the image as CC-BY NC but we can ignore. - Neutral / stable / no copyvio / broad

Whonting (talk) 09:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Whonting: Thank you! Responded. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 07:31, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
