Talk:Liz Kelly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| The content of Liz Kelly bibliography was merged into Liz Kelly on 27 July 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that an image or photograph of Liz Kelly be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in the United Kingdom may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Liz Kelly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20140319143647/https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/staff-and-associates/liz-kelly.cfm to https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/staff-and-associates/liz-kelly.cfm
- Added archive https://archive.is/20140319143647/https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/staff-and-associates/liz-kelly.cfm to https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/staff-and-associates/liz-kelly.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Merge proposal: Liz Kelly bibliography into this article
No need for seperate bibliography, I propose a merge. Sxologist (talk) 00:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Sxologist: I'm not seeing guidelines about when a separate bibliography is appropriate. Nothing is apparent to me in MOS:WORKS. Since it's far too long to be copied and pasted into Liz Kelly and someone took the time to compile it, I'm inclined to keep it. Daask (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support merge, wholesale or with a trim; the bibliography is a trivial list of publications, less helpful than clicking the World-Cat link in the authority control box on Kelly's page. Having said this, even a whole-sale merge would not be WP:TOOBIG. I also don't support the argument that as "someone took the time to compile it [we should] keep it"; there is a lot of material on Wikipedia that other have worked on, but that should nevertheless be deleted as it is not encylopaedic. Klbrain (talk) 21:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

