Talk:Max Balegde
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Max Balegde is currently a Television good article nominee. Nominated by Launchballer at 00:51, 6 June 2026 (UTC) This article is ready to be reviewed in accordance with the good article criteria. Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review the article and decide if it should be listed as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the instructions.
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Max Balegde appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 May 2026 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:26, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a UK prime minister's comments about gender irked Max Balegde into organising a fundraiser event?
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk) and Georgeykiwi (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 391 past nominations.
Launchballer 12:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC).
New enough, long enough. Article well-sourced, neutral, BLP-compliant, presentable, with no obvious copyright vios. Hook is short enough and interesting. It is sourced, but the source should be added here. No images in article. QPQ done. I will approve it when you add the source here to the template. Mariamnei (talk) 12:28, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, which guideline requires that? I tend to only add it when the source is offline/paywalled/otherwise tricky to access.--Launchballer 13:22, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
I'm looking through the guidelines, and I don't actually see such a requirement, so I may have misremembered. I am therefore approving the DYK. That being said, if you look at the nominations at WP:DYKN, the vast majority have a source cited right after the hook. This can be helpful so the reviewer shouldn't need to go chasing after the source and I would encourage you to do this in the future. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- It is most important that the source is cited within the article, and having reviewers check that it is actually cited there is important too. Sometimes the source is only cited in the DYK nomination template and not in the article, which is a problem. So thanks for checking. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, which guideline requires that? I tend to only add it when the source is offline/paywalled/otherwise tricky to access.--Launchballer 13:22, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
