Talk:Menstruation

Hi,

I think this article doesn't talk about menstruation experienced by men. Can you please expand the article with more information about it? 188.142.192.136 (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

I'd also like to see this change made; More gender-neutral language, also calling menstrual products just that as opposed to feminine hygiene products. AcidicRhythmist (talk) 04:19, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Additionally, the claim that the source is for refers to change "since the 1950s". The source is from 2006 - about 20 years ago. The 1950s was 70 years ago. 20 years is a significant chunk of that 70 years. Updated source (and perhaps therein an updated claim) is needed. Brainvoyage (talk) 01:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace

In the UK research has shown that for women allotment growers, access to sanitation for menstrual hygiene management is limited.

with

In the UK research has shown that for female allotment growers, access to sanitation for menstrual hygiene management is limited.

Reason: "Woman" is not an adjective. You can say "the women's team" (noun) but not "the women team" (false adjective). A second grammatical error is the plural use of women in "women allotment growers": even if "woman" were an adjective, which it is not, then it would have to be used as a singular, as for example in "a cat lover", not "a cats lover". A two-man boat, a three-time champion, a six person elevator, etc. 2A00:23C8:F512:3001:140E:520F:5CF0:3B2 (talk) 08:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

I've reworded for correct grammar. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 17:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)