Talk:NBCUniversal

To quote the memo from Brian Roberts, CEO of parent company Comcast: Today we announced the exciting news that we intend to launch a new publicly traded company comprised of a strong portfolio of our cable television networks, including USA Network, CNBC, MSNBC, Oxygen, E!, SYFY, and Golf Channel, along with complementary digital assets including Fandango and Rotten Tomatoes, GolfNow and Sports Engine.^[1] 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 13:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Long press statement here. Appears that the tentative company will be SpinCo; interesting choice of name. 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 13:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Only a tentative name for now, spin-offs in the business industry are named SpinCo in corporate press to start out with. Nate • (chatter) 16:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Right... but should we get a new company article going? 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 16:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Not right now...wait for much more to come, right now this is a section without true specifics (if we start an article on this now, the 'Universal Kids being sold to Scripps to become Qusproutbo' made-up crap IPs will give us headaches). Nate • (chatter) 17:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Any word on what becomes of NBCUniversal International Networks? There are some channels branded Syfy within the unit... BiggieSMLZ (talk) 22:08, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Notified the talk pages of all that needed it. 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 13:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Notified members of WikiProjects Companies, Media and Television. 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 13:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks to ActuallyNeverHappened02 for rolling back an edit today pointing to a different Versant. Now that the split is getting closer, it may be time to move the Versant details to a dedicated page. Would a senior editor consider spinning that up? (Per below, I have a self-declared COI related to Comcast NBCUniversal.) WeekdayUpdate (talk) 20:20, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks to @ViperSnake151 for creating an independent page for Versant (media company) — now it's there, would an editor consider tightening up the "Restructuring and Versant spinoff" section? It might make sense to trim that middle paragraph down to just the current opening sentence, "On November 20, 2024, Comcast announced that it would spin off most of its cable networks and selected digital properties into a new publicly traded company led by Mark Lazarus." — then link to the new page where all of the previous details are included. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 22:58, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Would an editor consider removing this sentence from the top section:

"Since November 7, 2018, Sky Group, which holds European-only media and telecommunications interests, is also under Comcast's control alongside Comcast Business."

Sky Group and Comcast Business are different businesses within Comcast Corporation, and not necessarily relevant to the history of NBCUniversal. Thanks for your consideration. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 20:49, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. GoldRomean (talk) 03:48, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Done WeekdayUpdate (talk) 18:31, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Would an editor consider making an update to the Divisons section? The current divisions are:

• Universal Destinations and Experiences
• NBCUniversal Media Group
• NBCUniversal News Group
• Universal Studios, Inc.

Universal Studio Group should be removed, as it is a unit within NBCUniversal Media Group, as validated by the NBCUniversal press website and by independent media coverage.^[1][2] Thanks for your consideration. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 21:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Done Dahawk04 (talk) 22:13, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Would an editor consider streamlining this section by removing this segment?

"NBC Studios series brought into the company include the NBC dramas Las Vegas (with DreamWorks Television), Crossing Jordan, and American Dreams. Universal Network Television brought the Law & Order franchise and The District—in fact, Universal Network Television had co-produced American Dreams with NBC before the merger. Universal Television Distribution shows also brought into company include Jerry Springer and Maury."

(Most of these shows have not been in production for many years.) Thanks for your consideration. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Done CornerLitTweak (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Would an editor consider shortening the Xumo paragraph under the "Preparation of Peacock streaming service" section? The first and last sentence are relevant to the NBCUniversal story, but everything else might be better told by linking to the Xumo page, where that information is duplicated. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

I'll let someone else respond to this, just want to point out that this very much looks more like an attempt to curate a page ("the NBCUniversal story") as opposed to making encyclopedic contributions Likeanechointheforest (talk) 18:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Not done: As stated by the other User, it is not needed, it makes it unencyclopedic. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 01:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Would an editor consider removing the paragraph under the "Preparation of Peacock streaming service" section beginning with "NBCUniversal Content Studios was formed in October 2019..." The organizational references are no longer relevant to the broader story. Thanks for your consideration. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 23:32, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Posting again what I posted above: "I'll let someone else respond to this, just want to point out that this very much looks more like an attempt to curate a page ("to the broader story") as opposed to making encyclopedic contributions Likeanechointheforest (talk) 18:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Not done: Read above. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 01:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

The user below has a request that an edit be made to NBCUniversal. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 407 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

COI Disclosure: I have a conflict of interest with this article as I work with NBCUniversal. Per Wikipedia guidelines, I am not editing directly but proposing changes here for community review.

Summary:

I've noticed the History section contains several topics that are scattered across multiple subsections but could be consolidated for better reader navigation, consistent with WP:LAYOUT guidance. This proposal involves reorganizing existing sourced content—not removing information or adding new material.

Observation 1: Sports broadcasting content is fragmented

The article currently mentions sports broadcasting deals in passing within the History narrative, but readers looking for information about NBCUniversal's sports broadcasting would need to search through multiple sections. Comparable articles like The Walt Disney Company and Warner Bros. Discovery use dedicated sections to consolidate this type of content.

Content that is currently scattered includes:

• Olympics broadcasting (mentioned briefly but not consolidated)
• League partnerships

Per WP:STRUCTURE, would editors support consolidating existing sports broadcasting references into a dedicated subsection? This would be a reorganization of existing content for navigation purposes.

Observation 2: Content about creative partnerships could be better organized

For example, the article currently discusses the Amblin Partners relationship in the History section (circa 2015-2017). This is a significant ongoing business relationship that spans film production and distribution. There are similar examples from artists like Tina Fey, Jordan Peele, Jason Blum, Christopher Nolan, and Dick Wolf that readers might find useful under a single subhead.

Would there be interest in whether this type of long-term partnership content would benefit from its own subsection, or should it remain in the chronological History narrative? I'm genuinely asking for community guidance here, as I recognize there are valid arguments for both approaches.

Note: I'm asking for community input on whether these structural changes would improve the article's navigation, not requesting specific wording. Happy to defer to whatever approach editors prefer. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented.

COI Disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and am not editing directly.

The introduction currently states that NBCUniversal has "ownership stakes in Snap Inc. and Vox Media." My understanding is that NBCUniversal has divested these positions.

Would an editor consider updating or removing this reference? I can provide sourcing for when these stakes were sold if that would be helpful. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 18:31, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

I found a citation showing that NBCUniversal sold its stake in Snap Inc., but could not find a similar citation about Vox Media. CornerLitTweak (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

The user below has a request that an edit be made to NBCUniversal. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 407 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

COI Disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and am not editing directly.

The article currently states NBCUniversal is "the third-largest operator of amusement parks in the world" citing 2017 TEA/AECOM data (reference 6). Current industry reports indicate NBCUniversal is now the second-largest operator.

Would an editor consider updating this with current sourcing? I can provide citations from recent TEA/AECOM reports or financial news coverage if helpful. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Do you have that citation? I can't find a report that matches this claim. CornerLitTweak (talk) 05:30, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

The user below has a request that an edit be made to NBCUniversal. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 407 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

COI Disclosure: I work with NBCUniversal and am not editing directly.

The "Possible acquisition of Paramount Skydance" subsection currently contains two items, both describing events that have not occurred. The sources cited attribute the claims to unnamed industry analysts and use speculative language ("may try to merge," "may merge to bolster"). No acquisition has been announced, no regulatory filing exists, and no official negotiations have been confirmed by either party.

Per WP:CRYSTAL, Wikipedia generally avoids presenting speculation about future events as encyclopedic content. I'd also note that comparable articles (The Walt Disney Company, Warner Bros. Discovery) do not include standalone subsections for rumored acquisitions that remain unconfirmed.

Would an editor consider whether this subsection meets the threshold for inclusion under WP:CRYSTAL? If there's consensus that the coverage is notable enough to retain, a single sentence within the broader restructuring context might be more proportionate than a dedicated subsection. WeekdayUpdate (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2026 (UTC)