Talk:No.6 Collaborations Project
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the No.6 Collaborations Project article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 23 May 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. There's consensus against move. Weak arguments against. (non-admin closure) – Ammarpad (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
No. 6 Collaborations Project → No.6 Collaborations Project – There's no space. Unreal7 (talk) 18:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry for not noticing the typo while creating the article. Pretty sure this qualifies as a non-controversial move and doesn’t require discussion. Pinging Anthony Appleyard to make the move and close this.—NØ 18:51, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – I'm pretty sure that "No. 6" is the correct way to write it. JE98 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per No. 5 Collaborations Project. Redthreadhx (talk) 21:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Forgive me if I’m missing something, but every source as well as the iTunes pre-order are going with No.6 Collaborations Project . How does this have anything to do with his earlier EP which clearly did have the space ?—NØ 06:38, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- I agree it should be "No.6", but here it is obvious he named it after No.5 (note without space) and it is odd to put space in one and not put space in another when they are somehow related. Redthreadhx (talk) 10:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support because it is the official name of the album, and the WP:COMMONNAME used in reliable sources . Calidum 04:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support – the album title is clearly written as “No.6” on iTunes and on Sheeran’s post. There’s no “correct” way to write “No.” as far as I’m aware, so we should just go with the official version. Hayman30 (talk) 04:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support – the album title is clearly written as “No.6” on Apple Music. -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 06:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.