Talk:Parthenos tigrina

Hi, I've restored the {{over-quotation}}, I see Mitsingh that you've shortened it, yes. But the concern is that the entirety of the article is just the quotation. It is likely fine from a copyright perspective as it was published in 1908, it just that there is no summary style of the actual text itself. It should instead describe in summary style the description of the species and then cite to the work. As it was published in 1908, it can follow pretty closely, it just needs to be more encyclopedic. The length is fine, per se, I see that you've shortened it; I understand the confusing nature of the template but it shouldn't be the whole article. Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

I've done some cleanup to write it more in summary style citing to the source. Love to know what you think. Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

In my opinion the title should be changed back to subspecies as the species P.tigrina has been well defined.

The first part in that section is now irrelevant and should be deleted. Mitsingh (talk) 14:40, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

@Mitsingh: no objection if you wanted to do that. I was simply trying to preserve as much of your original quotation as possible because, like I mentioned, I wasn't concerned with the overall length, but rather that it was nothing but the quotation. Feel free to further trim if you'd like, or adjust/remove section titles/headers. Best, Bobby Cohn (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)