Wikiwand AI

Talk:Vantage Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:, WikiProject Companies To-do: ...
Close

COI edit request: article title and branding consistency following company rebrand

Hello editors,

More information Extended content ...
Close

Thank you for your time and consideration. I would be happy to provide additional reliable sources or factual clarification if helpful. Kdenney (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Kdenney

Reply 27-JUN-2026

  Please use WP:RM#CM  

  • Requests to change an article's title should be submitted using the {{requested move}} template specifically as a controversial move request process requiring discussion amongst the wider community.
  • A controversial requested move typically takes about 7 days to complete. Before taking this step, please ensure that you are acquainted with the requested move process by thoroughly reviewing its procedures. More information can be found at requested moves.

Regards,  Spintendo  18:28, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the guidance, Spintendo. I appreciate the clarification. I'll review the Requested Move process and follow that procedure instead. Kdenney (talk) 14:42, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Requested move 1 July 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 17:01, 12 July 2026 (UTC)


Vantage Airport GroupVantage Group – I am the user Kdenney and have disclosed on my user page that I am affiliated with Vantage Group. Per the guidance above and because of my conflict of interest, I am requesting that the community consider this move rather than attempting to make it directly. The article title no longer appears to reflect the name by which the company is now commonly identified.
While the article remains titled Vantage Airport Group, the lead, infobox, website, and article text already identify the company as Vantage Group and describe "Vantage Airport Group" as its former name.
Since the company's June 2024 rebrand, multiple independent reliable sources have consistently referred to the company as Vantage Group, including TRBusiness (20 June 2024); Airport X News (25 June 2024); The Moodie Davitt Report (20 June 2024); TravelDailyNews (21 June 2024); AirportIR (22 October 2024). These sources were provided in my earlier COI edit request above.
Given that the article itself already acknowledges the current company name, I believe the article title should be evaluated under Wikipedia's naming conventions to determine whether Vantage Group has become the appropriate title. If editors determine that another title (such as a disambiguated title) is more appropriate, I welcome that discussion.
Thank you for your consideration. Kdenney (talk) 14:51, 1 July 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 16:00, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Oppose, WP:NAMECHANGE not demonstrated: the aforementioned sources only cover the name change, they don't show that the new name is being used when covering the company. And it also looks like you haven't argued for a clear move:

Proposal Move Vantage Airport GroupVantage Group Rationale

I don't see that as a name for the group anywhere. Did you use LLM to make this contribution? Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:02, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Actually, I see that you may have meant this as a demarcation of different parts of your proposal. I've striken my observation. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:05, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Single line breaks do not show, nor do they show at RM/CD. I've decided to tackle this with some paragraph break templates so that this RM is actually readable. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 21:33, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Thank you, Bobby and Sammi, for taking the time to review my request and help me navigate this process. As someone who is new to contributing on Wikipedia, I recognize there is a learning curve, and your comments have helped me better understand both the process and the policies involved.
@Bobby Cohn, your comment helped me better understand the distinction between sources that announce a name change and sources that demonstrate how independent organizations have referred to the company since the rebrand. My original sources were primarily intended to establish that the rebrand occurred, but I understand that the requested move discussion is really about common usage.
Since your comment, I looked specifically for more recent examples where independent organizations refer to the company simply as Vantage Group in the ordinary course of reporting. A few examples I found include:
I recognize that it is ultimately up to the community to determine whether these, together with the other sources, demonstrate sufficient common usage to support a move under Wikipedia's naming conventions. I simply wanted to provide additional independent examples that seem more directly responsive to the point that was raised.
Regarding the earlier question about AI, yes, I used AI as a writing assistant to help me understand Wikipedia's requested move and conflict of interest processes and to organize my thoughts. I personally reviewed, edited, and verified every statement before posting, and I independently located and reviewed each of the sources cited here.
Thank you again for your time, patience, and willingness to help a new contributor learn the process. Kdenney (talk) 22:07, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
Good with that, Support. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 17:26, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks