Talk:Weightlifting at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 61 kg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Good articleWeightlifting at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 61 kg has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 3, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Close
More information To-do list: ...
Close

Thank you

Really appreciate user @Svefnpurka who was updating this event in real time! Philliposophy (talk) 15:36, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:08, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

  • Source:
5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 70 past nominations.

Arconning (talk) 04:51, 21 March 2026 (UTC).

I'm posting the alternatives which have been proposed in the other discussion to hopefully aid discussion here:
TarnishedPathtalk 03:54, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
I'd say I'm more inclined to either of the ALT8s as the other hooks were brought up to be somewhat "trivial" by the other editors. Arconning (talk) 06:44, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
I'd go with ALT8A, but I note that the absence of a host entry is also mentioned in that article. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
My concern remains on whether reliable, independent sources mention these claims about the aggregated events, or is this WP:OR, going beyond 1+1=2 basic WP:CALCs?—Bagumba (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
@Bagumba: @TarnishedPath: Due to the length of this nomination still being up, I'm willing to create hook for each individual article instead to remove the concern of WP:OR. Let me know if that's alright. Arconning (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
@Arconning:, that's probably your best bet. TarnishedPathtalk 09:45, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
@Arconning: Agreed.—Bagumba (talk) 16:55, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Since there's been a lengthy discussion... hooks shall now be for each individual article. Arconning (talk) 09:21, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Weightlifting at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 61 kg

Weightlifting at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 73 kg

Weightlifting at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 89 kg

Weightlifting at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 102 kg

Weightlifting at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's +102 kg

I appreciate the new source, but the issue is that it's a superlative hook and I'm not sure if BarBend is reliable enough for such a strong claim. Ideally we need more sources. Will you be able to find others? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: Probably not, removing the hook now.. Arconning (talk) 03:28, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
I've numbered the latest round of individual hooks and I am approving ONLY ALT9b and ALT9d. ALT9a does not pass DYKINT because every country that participates in the Olympics will have some area of "best results". ALT9c is not particularly interesting since 1.8 million lei equates to about US$100,000, and that is not a spectacular amount to allocate for litigation in the world of international sport authorities. ALT9e is pumped up as "historic" by the source, but being the 5th person to reach a particular accomplishment is not especially unusual or intriguing. Given that this has now passed the DYKTIMEOUT threshold, I do not recommend further workshopping of hooks. (Note to promoter: one or both of these will need to be promoted manually as PSHAW will only work on one. Please be sure the correct article is labeled in the prep area template.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:56, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Weightlifting at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's 61 kg/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Arconning (talk · contribs) 10:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: TheBritinator (talk · contribs) 14:54, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello I will review this. Please give me time to go through the article and I will leave comments as I go. TheBritinator (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

@Arconning Article looks good, not really anything I think I need to comment on. There's one source that needs clarification but other than that it should be good to pass. TheBritinator (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
@TheBritinator Added a source, decided not to move the medalists to be consistent with the other articles. Arconning (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Sure, no worries. Source looks good now, so I'm going to pass this. Good work. TheBritinator (talk) 16:05, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Lead/infobox

  • Lead feels a bit bottom-heavy. Perhaps the medallists could be moved up to the lede instead?
  • Rest seems good.

Background & Results

  • Looks good, nothing sticks out to me here.

Scope

  • checkY Seems to cover all the bases.

Neutrality

  • checkY All prose is appears neutral and without bias.

Stability

  • checkY No sign of active edit wars.

Illustration

References

  • ? 2 (Xinhua): It says that he broke the record but I don't see 175 kilograms, unless I am missing something.
  • checkY 8 (Sports Illustrated): Checks out.
  • checkY 13 (Tokyo Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games): Checks out, I think.
  • checkY 18 (Olympedia): Checks out.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI