Talk:Zero Hedge

I cannot make edits on this article myself since I am not yet extended confirmed, but I think it is notable that Infogalactic news uses this article as currently sole source. This could be added into the 2014 to 2018 reception section. SneakAttak (talk) 09:33, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Are there any reliable secondary sources that cover Infogalactic's use of Zero Hedge? — Newslinger talk 23:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace logo with new vector version available at File:Zero Hedge.svg Obscure2020 (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done M.Bitton (talk) 22:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove the term "Far Right". 2601:601:D37F:B8C0:E6F0:9694:8B0A:4BB1 (talk) 01:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Rainsage (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

No, it should be ultra far right. 47.150.78.94 (talk) 03:07, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

I agree that it should not necessarily be referred to using the blanket term "far-right". This description is all too often used on Wikipedia where a more appropriate description would be "conservative" or "right-leaning". Even that description may be too heavy-handed when applied to the site as a whole. Many of the articles on ZeroHedge have little or no political stance and simply report financial updates and developments. At the present time, 20 articles are visible on the home page of ZeroHedge and only 3 of the 20 are overtly political or show an obvious political stance. The vast majority of content appears to be analysis of financial reports and commentary on the reports of financial institutions. 12.5.37.226 (talk) 18:01, 30 September 2025 (UTC)