User:Naksum1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This user is a student editor in University_of_Richmond/Data_and_Society_(Spring_2026). |
Annotated Bibliography and Article Outline
@Naksum1:
I've had a chance to read through your annotated bibliography (User:Naksum1/FRIENDS program/Bibliography) and your article outline (User:Naksum1/FRIENDS program/Outline). I think you're at a really good point in planning out how you are going to improve your chosen article. The scope of your planned edits is good, and will be manageable to complete by the end of the semester. I am curious, though, about the section drawing comparisons to the Coping Cat program -- is there enough in the sources that you've found to substantiate this being an entire section of its own? Or perhaps it might make more sense for this comparison to be integrated into another section -- possibly as a brief mention in the "Format" section? As you work on your article, experiment with which organization structure works best to communicate this information in an encyclopedic way.
Your sources look like they are reputable and relevant to your topic. It's good that you are primarily drawing upon review and meta-review articles -- for anything that is even loosely related to human health topics, there are extra guidelines for sources. Looks like you're doing exactly what you need to do, but as always feel free to check back through the dashboard and trainings if you have any questions.
One other final note -- be sure to double check your citations when entering them into the actual article. Wikipedia tends to do pretty well with grabbing information from published sources. But sometimes DOI numbers get misformatted or other errors pop up (I've had this happen a few times!). So just wanted to flag this as something to keep an eye on.