User talk:3Daxial2424
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:52, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Upper Bhadra irrigation scheme (July 21)
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Upper Bhadra irrigation scheme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, 3Daxial2424!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 20:18, 21 July 2025 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
IndiGo
Why are you adding a source to a section that refers to a separate article about the IndiGo-delays? The Banner talk 11:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry I overlooked the article link. I will remove the reference. 3Daxial2424 (talk) 12:07, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi 3Daxial2424. Thank you for your work on Slackbuie. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this article. It's a stub for now, but as an occupied place, it's likely to be notable.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Your draft article, Draft:Upper Bhadra irrigation scheme
Hello, 3Daxial2424. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Upper Bhadra irrigation scheme".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:23, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Neolithic ashmounds
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Neolithic ashmounds, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi 3Daxial2424. Thank you for your work on Upper Bhadra Irrigation project. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for this interesting article on an irrigation project. While the official government site is hard to reach there are sufficient sources to establish notability of this important, and sometimes controversial, topic.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)