User talk:Adideshpande

Hello, I'm Janan2025. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Daulatabad Fort have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Janan2025 (talk) 07:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Give me a clear reason that why aren't you doing those changes and if someone did then undoing those changes Adideshpande (talk) 10:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

I wanted to let you know that your recent contribution to Aurangabad Caves has been undone because it did not appear constructive. Please read WP:COMMONNAME. Articles should use the agreed commonly-used English-language name. If you think that an article has the wrong name, you should look at the article talk page to see if the choice of article name has been discussed before. You can request a single page move by clicking on the "Add topic" (or "New section") tab of the talk page of the article you want moved, without adding a new subject/header, inserting this code:

{{subst:requested move|New name|reason=Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.}}

Replace New name with the requested new name of the page (or with a simple question mark, if you want more than one possible new name to be considered). The template will automatically create the heading "Requested move 28 April 2026" and sign the post for you.

There is no need to edit the article in question. Once the above code is added to the Talk page, a bot will automatically add the following notification at the top of the affected page:

A request that this page title be changed is under discussion. Please do not move this page until the discussion is closed.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:54, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Islamic–Hindu relations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. StartOkayStop (talk) 06:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Patnadevi when you modified the page, you introduced conversion errors. The {{convert}} template can be complex and I encourage you to read its documentation but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it and when conversion errors are present they will show up in red. It is strongly recommended that you always use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank You Sir Adideshpande (talk) 06:00, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) caste-related topics in South Asia.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

FDW777 (talk) 07:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

If I see any more misrepresentations of allegations as convictions, as you posted at Talk:Love jihad conspiracy theory, I will have no hesitation in calling for you to be blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 07:17, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

What do you know about what is happening in my country with my people and who gave you the right to decide what is going on in MY COUNTRY You are just one of those illiterate leftist freaks who are spreading propogandas like ISLAMOPHOBIA

And if your argument is that India is an ISLAMOPHOBIC Country then how can an ISLAMOPHOBIC Country make its president

mind you president 4 times people from muslim community

list is here

Zakir Hussain

Mohd. Hidayatullah

Fakruddin Ali Ahemad

AND THE GREAT Dr.Avul Pakir Jainulabdeen Abdul Kalam who is also considered as One of the greatest scientist India ever had.

Its not hate brother

We are Indians We know how to love and whom to love with and how to hate and whom to hate with

Remember this line

"Here in India, there is as much hatred for Kasab as there is respect for Kalam."

Please look in your own west don't poke your snot filled nose in my country's Local and Regional Affairs

JAI HIND

JAI SHREE RAAM Adideshpande (talk) 06:10, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm not the slightest bit interested in your ranting. If you wish to contribute to Wikipedia, you are obliged to do so according to the policies the editing community at large has arrived at, by consensus, over many years. There are absolutely no circumstances where it is permitted to misrepresent allegations of serious crimes as convictions. Not in relation to India, or anywhere else. The same rules apply to all. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:42, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Then shutup your shitty mouth Adideshpande (talk) 08:33, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Do not change longstanding article titles because you believe they are "misspelled". We use the common name, not the most "correct" one (if such a thing even exists). —Kusma (talk) 13:45, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

which article you are talking of

and if your are talking about the Jagdish chandra bose article it is a historical fact that his name was Jagdish chandra Basu

same goes with Subhash Chandra Basu and Satyendranath Basu Adideshpande (talk) 06:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

These moves need to be discussed on the talk page first. We typically match what reliable sources written in English use, and for many of the refs in the article, 'Jagdish chandra bose' is used.Dialectric (talk) 13:06, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 15:12, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} or use the unblock wizard.  EvergreenFir (talk) 04:49, 28 April 2026 (UTC)