Talk:Love jihad conspiracy theory

Following a copyright investigation that confirmed there have been no versions of this article that did not contain improperly used non-free content, it has been replaced. Some of the content and structure of the original have been retained, although passages have been rewritten to confirm to copyright policy and non-free content practices. Since the structure and some of the language is retained, attribution is required under both CC-By-SA and GFDL for previous contributors. Since the copyrighted contents were twice restored out of process (once accidentally), continued publication of earlier versions of this article seems likely to result in a return of copyrighted contents. Accordingly, the history has been deleted. For attribution, the list of previous contributors is provided here:

Attribution history

Contributors are reminded, please, not to import text from previously published sources unless that text is public domain or licensed compatibly with our Terms of Use (see copyright policy for more details). Brief excerpts of non-free text can be utilized in accordance with non-free content guidelines, but in all cases these must be clearly marked by quotation marks or block quotation. All other use of copyrighted text is prohibited by Wikipedia's policy. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Bhagwa_Love_Trap_conspiracy_theory

He told me to discuss at redirect's talk page. If Wikipedia does not have any discussion page for redirect review, I want this to be discussed here. As the above page Bhagwa Love Trap conspiracy theory is redirected to this Love jihad page.

There were many good sources and the article should be an independent article not redirected here.

See- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bhagwa_Love_Trap_conspiracy_theory&oldid=1263195047#References

I am requesting other editors to check the sources. ~2026-36094-61 (talk) 04:07, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

I agree with the result of the AfD nomination that turned this into a redirect. InfernoHues (talk) 12:56, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

I also agree with the AfD result, which noted that material could be integrated here as needed. The particular phrase "Bhagwa love trap" seems to be largely localised to 2023, which is another point against a standalone article at that particular title. Einsof (talk) 13:22, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Not just 2023, this is September 2025- https://ndtv.in/india/radical-thinking-conspiracy-and-bhagwa-love-trap-muslim-youth-use-tactics-to-defame-girls-from-their-own-community-9346192 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-36514-28 (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This--The Bhagwa Love Trap conspiracy theory, which alleges that Hindu men lure Muslim women into relationships with the intention of converting them to Hinduism, has been popularised on social media---

Needs a separate subsection ~2026-38405-28 (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

•  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — EarthDude (Talk) 06:55, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

popularised on social media — Wikipedia usually only accepts high-quality secondary sources. Social media is only in very, very limited cases and circumstances permitted as a source, and this is not one of those cases. Nakonana (talk) 09:46, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Notability has nothing to do with real or fake. The sources are not facebook, twitter. ~2026-38774-20 (talk) 16:47, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Nobody said anything about notability. The existing content is sourced. You have provided no further sources, nor made any proposal for additional content. Either make a specific proposal for additional text, citing the necessary sources, or consider this discussion closed. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Did you read nakonama's comment properly?--popularised on social media — Wikipedia usually only accepts high-quality secondary sources. Social media is only in very, very limited cases and circumstances permitted as a source, and this is not one of those cases.

He did not check available sources.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-67101250

https://scroll.in/article/1051039/bhagwa-love-trap-a-social-media-conspiracy-theory-has-divided-indias-muslims

https://www.altnews.in/bhagwa-love-trap-an-elaborate-conspiracy-theory-in-response-to-the-love-jihad-narrative/

https://www.thequint.com/news/india/muslim-woman-harassed-doxed-by-muslim-men-bhagwa-love-trap ~2026-39116-30 (talk) 03:53, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

The first two sources look pretty good, I wouldn't be opposed to a subsection in this article. InfernoHues (talk) 04:05, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

This is just more of the same as #3Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion above. This constant posting of non-requests is tiresome. If people want anything added or changed in this article, then they need to post a coherent edit request with references, not just spam the talk page with news article posts in the hope someone else will write the article for them. FDW777 (talk) 13:08, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

The third one seems also fine: Alt News. Nakonana (talk) 09:16, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

सलमान खान के पास सन्नी सिंह के नाम से वोटर आईडी कार्ड, आधार कार्ड मिला है. शादी का रजिस्ट्रेशन सन्नी सिंह के नाम से है. केस दर्ज होने के बाद सलमान खान उर्फ सन्नी सिंह गिरफ्तार किया गया. उसने सरिता से पहले 2 और लड़कियों के नाम गिनाये है. https://x.com/hindipatrakar/status/2085683836323811496 ~2026-43534-87 (talk) 11:59, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

We do not cite X, or other social media. And even if we did, someone being arrested for something isn't proof of anything. And please post in English in future - this is the English-language Wikipedia. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2026 (UTC)