User talk:BartBassist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Family tree of the Han Dynasty, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Family tree of the Han Dynasty was changed by BartBassist (u) (t) score equals -4042 on 2008-03-29T11:56:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Just to clarify the matter, for anyone reading my discussion page – this edit was in fact a reversion of an edit which removed the entire content of the relevant article. I did not bother to lodge a false positive report, as the page (as have the other Chinese imperial family trees) has since altered significantly (the formatting on the current set of pages is just about entirely my doing). Just thought I'd clear that one up. BartBassist (talk) 00:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Stephen Hendry
And re: William Wallace: the Wallace monument was built in honour of Mel Gibson in Braveheart, right? </American tourist> - Dudesleeper / Talk 00:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Re:Scottish monarchs' family tree
There are more inaccuracies in it than that! I don't that you should have restored it ... inaccurate information is inaccurate information, in an image or not ... but there you go, I'm not gonna revert you. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
$100 bill
I recently read your comment on the $100 bill reverse side image page. I just want to tell you that that's how the image is on the bill. The painter who painted the picture made a mistake and painted "4" as "IV" instead of how it appears on Independence Hall ("IIII"). So the picture is real. Armyrifle (talk) 20:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
RfD nomination of a template redirect
I have nominated a redirect to a template for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 15:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Worcestershire squad
I have nominated Worcestershire squad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 03:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Prof Dame Hazel Genn
This article is about UCL's Professor of Socio-Legal Studies (UCL profile here), and it needs a (free license) photograph and a short bibliography that summarises her most important publications. As you're currently studying in the Law Faculty, would you like to help with either of these? Thanks in advance - Pointillist (talk) 10:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Ksw logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ksw logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- You said you were busy with your mid-term assignments so I have fixed up the copyright for you! Thanks for agreeing to help on the Hazel Genn article when you are less busy. - Pointillist (talk) 10:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
RGS Worcester and The Alice Ottley School
RE to do list: Talk:RGS Worcester and The Alice Ottley School- an article you have been involved with. As a local person, I have just read the entire articlewith great interest. It has obviously been prepared with great care, and I hesitate to tag it; however, I feel it still reads partly like an essay and that some passages contain subjective wording that may conflict with Wikipedia's MOS.--Kudpung (talk) 02:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for this. Actually, I am astonished that my contributions to the RGS page have been noted: I was a King's man myself, and have contributed far more to that page than to the RGS one. But glad to see that someone is noting my small efforts! BartBassist (talk) 23:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
King's School
Hi Bart! I nearly became a King's pupil in 1960, but I had to be content with playing rugger agaist them for one of the 'others'
I was the one responsible for adding many of the recent tags on King's School. I have no objection to them being removed as long as they have served their purpose in drawing attention to areas that might need some attention. I have a particular interest in schools in Worcestershire but apart from copyediting, I don't have the resources to fill in any gaps. I do read articles thoroughly before tagging, hence the inline passives that have no citations. I did leave a message about this on the article's talk page. Jenuk and I collaborate closely on the Worcestershire Project (although we share our differences of opinion !)--Kudpung (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Kotromanić family tree
Hello, BartBassist! I am trying to create a family tree of a medieval royal family of Bosnia. However, I can't figure out how to use Template:Family tree! I've been trying for months and I've asked many users I "know", but they they don't have a clue about using it either. I found a large family tree made by you and I was amazed (if only because I can't make family tree for a nuclear family :)). Would you please create the Kotromanić family tree for me? It would be very useful as it would help users understand Sigismund of Luxembourg's claim to the throne of Bosnia, as well as Hermann II of Cilli's claim to the throne of Bosnia. The tree is not too long - only six generations - and it is not nearly as complicated as Kings of the Hellenes family tree. I would be very grateful!
Here is a link to a picture of the family tree I made using Paint (even a picture made by me using Paint sucks): http://img269.imageshack.us/i/48286722.png/'>
Thanks in advance! Surtsicna (talk) 16:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- WoW! That's much better than I imagined! Sincere thanks! Could you just add Prince Sigismund and Princess Catherine, the two younger children of King Stephen Thomas? They are important because they were proclaimed heirs to the kingdom by their mother's will. You don't have to add their mother. Jadwiga should be removed, as she wasn't relevant to the succession to the throne of Bosnia and removing her would create space for Ostoja and Tvrtko II. That shouldn't be a problem, given how complex family tree you've already made. I am going to add the family tree to the House of Kotromanić article and bs:Kotromanići. Surtsicna (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
An early draft of the family tree (kept for the records). BartBassist (talk) 10:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC):
| Prijezda I 1211-1287 Ban 1250-87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stephen I 1242-1314 Ban 1287-1314 | Prijezda II d.1290 Ban 1287-90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stephen II d.1353 Ban (1314-)1322-53 | Vladislav d.1354 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charles IV 1316-(r.1346-)1378 HRE 1355-78 | Katerina c.1336-1396 m. Hermann I of Celje | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elizabeth 1340-1387 | Louis I of Hungary 1326-(r.1342-)1382 | Margaret of Bohemia 1335-1349 | Hermann II of Celje c.1365-1435 | Tvrtko I 1338-1391 Ban 1353-77 King 1377-91 | Dabiša d.1395 King 1391-95 | Jelena Gruba d.aft.1299 Queen 1395-98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jadwiga of Poland 1373/4-1399 | Mary c.1371-1395 | Sigismund 1368-(r.1387-)1437 HRE 1433-37 | Barbara of Celje 1392-1451 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ostoja d.1418 King 1398-1404, 1409-18 | Tvrtko II 1381-1443 King 1404-09, 1421-43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ostojić d.1421 King 1418-21 | Radivoj d.1463 King 1433-35 | Tomaš d.1461 King 1443-61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tomašević 1438-1463 King 1461-63 | Sigismund (Ishak-beg Kraljević) b.1449 | Katerina 1459-c.1470 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Jadwiga surely is important, but not for the House of Kotromanić. Mary is more important for the Kotromanić dynasty because Tvrtko and Dabiša were her vassals and her husband claimed the Bosnian crown in her right. Charles IV is indeed irrelevant and unnecessary. Adding queens consort would be better than adding Charles IV and Margaret, though it isn't so easy - Tvrtko I had no children with his queen but did have two illegitimate children (though some sources assign Tvrtko II to his wife), Tvrtko I's son Ostoja had three wives and a son with the second wife as well as two illegitimate sons. Ostoja's son had two wives and children with both. Is it possible to create such family tree? Don't bother making it if it would be too complex. Anyway, I prefer Cilli because it is used more often in English. Surtsicna (talk) 21:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- You amaze me every time! The tree is so wonderfully simple, yet descriptive and inclusive! I am going to put it into the House of Kotromanić article right away! Surtsicna (talk) 12:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunatly, the sources you use seem to be self-published and as such they are not reliable. Neither Bosnian-language books nor English-language books give years of birth and death of people such as Elizabeth of Serbia, Elizabeth of Kuyavia, Catherine of Bosnia, etc. That's why I think it is better to remove the dates, unless reliable sources can back them up. Surtsicna (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Barty
Pick up your mobile?
Alex —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.14.159 (talk) 12:37, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Jordanian Royal Family
If you are bored and looking for a family tree to build, you could build a family tree of the Jordanian Royal Family. It would be useful for the Line of succession to the Jordanian throne. If you decide to do it, don't include wives of kings and princes - as King Hussein alone had four wives, it would be very difficult. Also, you don't have to include any princess, as princesses are not relevant for the article and the royal family is too large to include each member. So, male members only would be the easiest and tidiest way. Bye! Surtsicna (talk) 16:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Can you speak Chinese?
What dose the "div." mean in Chinese emperors family tree (late)? 星光下的人 (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- OH,no,Division (military) is a military unit,it means “师”,but 郡 is a administrative machinery unit,they are not the same meaning. 星光下的人 (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- First,about Commandery,you can see Qing Dynasty nobility,this page use "prince of a commandery " to translate “郡王”,this is the reason which I use it.And Commandry (feudalism) corresponding Chinese page is also “郡”。I agree this word is so long, "Comm." maybe better.
Second,about Guangxu's adoption,it is truely.In China,adoption called "过继",it can happen after sb is death,and "过继“ only can happen in Firts generation and Second generation.Guangxu Emperor and Tongzhi Emperor is the same generation ,we call "堂兄弟”(first cousin),they can not adopted . In Draft History of Qing(清史稿),it says "he(Guangxu) is adopted to Wenzong(Xianfeng),to succeed the throne,become next emperor"(以上继文宗为子,入承大统,为嗣皇帝)。 星光下的人 (talk) 00:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
About Chinese emperors family tree (early)
I think [This edition] is better than your change.The same generation in same line is more important than son-sequence,and Why not Western Han and Eastern Han in one tree?星光下的人 (talk) 01:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Can you draw the branch in sequence when you build the family tree?It's hard to me. = =||| 星光下的人 (talk) 11:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- How to add Liu Penzi in Chinese emperors family tree (early),he is also a emperor,although a puppet.His line is Gaozu——Prince Daohui of Qi(齐悼惠王刘肥)——Prince Jing of Chengyang (城阳景王刘章)——Liu Xi(城阳恭王刘喜)——Liu Yan(城阳顷王刘延)——Liu Yi(城阳敬王刘义)——Prince Hui of Chengyang(城阳惠王刘武)——Liu Shun(城阳荒王刘顺)——Marquess of Shi式侯 Liu xian(刘宪)——Marquess of Shi式侯 Liu Ba(刘霸)(no son)
Marquess of Shi式侯 Liu xian(刘宪)——Marquess of Shi式侯 Liu Meng(刘萌)——Liu Penzi 刘盆子 星光下的人 (talk) 01:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- son-sequence of yuan is wrong,please see Family tree of Genghis Khan 星光下的人 (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- How do you recognize the Emperor and Dynasty? Why Dose other kingdoms 's monarchs are not emperors?Dose Chinese emperors family tree (ancient) all are emperors? 星光下的人 (talk) 03:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)




