Wikiwand AI

User talk:Danbloch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Colorado Apex ultimate frisbee team.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Colorado Apex ultimate frisbee team.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Tip: most logos are copyright free and can be uploaded to the commons with the template {{PD-textlogo}}. The template can be used for logos for which the "logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text". Off and running (talk) 20:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

My edit to Help:Wikitext

I'd like to discuss your reversion of my edit to Help:Wikitext. Is this the right place to talk? Spel-Punc-Gram (talk) 04:56, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Either here or Help talk:Wikitext is fine. Danbloch (talk) 05:04, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Discussion over on Generation Z talk page, serious allegations

Hey @Danbloch, it's me again. I apologize for the disturbance, but I wanted to ask for your opinion over on the Gen Z talk page? I left a ping with your name in the discussion. To summarize, the user Kapartem is making serious allegations about me as well as Nerd271, Some1, and Zillennial. Do you still agree with the current lead? Nerd271, Some1, and myself still have the same consensus since March, but I think it' s best to ask again for what the consensus is so that everyone is in the know-how as well because what Kapartem is saying is hurtful and serious. ChicagoGirlD (talk) 23:18, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Status quo ante

Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent edits concerning this redirect.

The problem with linking Status quo ante directly to the list entry is that it leaves no room for a hatnote. It's plausible that a user seeking Status Quo Ante would arrive here by typing the lowercase expression, and not have any way of navigating to the intended page. I believe the edit I made best resolves this; what do you recommend? 162 etc. (talk) 18:26, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. If you look at List of Latin phrases (S)#status quo ante, the current Status quo ante, you'll see that it includes "For other uses, see Status Quo Ante." If you don't think this is sufficient, you could put the hatnote in the table cell. Am I missing something? Danbloch (talk) 18:49, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
I don't think hatnotes are usually inserted mid-table in this way, but that is better than the previous version; I've made the edit. 162 etc. (talk) 19:03, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary account IP viewer granted

The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address

Hello, Danbloch. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

  • You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
  • Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

  • When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
  • Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
  • Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:18, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks