User talk:Davidninjaking

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Talk:2025 Bondi Beach shooting) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 01:12, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

This talk page is a complex area that is not a good training ground for a new editor. While you're welcome to edit every other article and talk page, repeating the behavior you showed here will lead to a broader block. Star Mississippi 01:13, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Why am I blocked? I believe all I did was engage in respectiful discussion with the other editors. I never spammed or abused any editing priviliges. Please advise. Davidninjaking (talk) 00:13, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Art of Problem Solving logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 08:11, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lucius Cornelius Scipio and Publius Cornelius Scipio. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me. I removed the links. Davidninjaking (talk) 15:01, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art of Problem Solving.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Art of Problem Solving and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:36, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your review Robert.

I am a current student in Art of Problem Solving (no paid editing) and have alread discosed in my talk page.

Regarding notability: The draft relies on independent secondary sources with significant coverage of the organization: - The Atlantic (2016 "The Math Revolution"): Multiple paragraphs discussing AoPS's online platform, community, enrollment, expansions (e.g., Beast Academy), and role in advanced math education trends. - Common Sense Education review: In-depth independent analysis of the company's divisions, resources (online school, Alcumus, forums), and educational model. - Cathy Duffy Reviews: Comprehensive independent review of the curriculum, textbooks, online tools, and problem-solving approach. These address the organization directly (history, products, impact) beyond passing mentions.

The draft has also been revised for neutral tone. Does this help, or are there specific improvements needed? Thank you. Davidninjaking (talk) 01:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)