User talk:Dominus

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

I saw you put a bare link (probably temporarily) on Tidewater flour mill explosion. If you want an easier way to turn links into Wikipedia references, check out https://citer.toolforge.org/. KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 15:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Adam Rhys Dee. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 07:23, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure what happened here exactly. I remember creating an Adam Rhys Dee article in 2023, but then it was deleted in January 2024 as being insufficiently notable, and I gave up on it. As far as I knew that was the end of the matter. What was it that you converted to a draft, exactly? —Mark Dominus (talk) 15:59, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Ah. From the history, it looks as though the PROD was challenged by Barr Theo, and the article was restored by an administrator. Anyway, it's now at Draft:Adam Rhys Dee, for you or Barr Theo to take from there. Sorry for any confusion. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Please add reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 03:18, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

“I am working! I'm supervisin’ you guys!” —Mark Dominus (talk) 09:48, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Dominus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adam Rhys Dee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Dominus. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Adam Rhys Dee".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Dominus. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 23 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 19:20, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Huatu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is:

• a disambiguation page with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" which lists only one extant Wikipedia page (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• a disambiguation page that lists zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Dan arndt (talk) 08:52, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

The article Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence presented of significant coverage in independent sources necessary to meet relevant Wikipedia notability guidelines, and a Google search finds nothing obvious either.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

How is WP:SNOW essay relevant to a PROD for an article which cites no independent sources? You are of course entitled to remove the prod, but when doing so, it has to be preferable to give something more relevant as a justification. I'll probably leave it for a few days, but if I don't see such sourcing, I'm going to take the article to AfD. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:52, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Or you could look for the sources yourself. INFORMS is the largest U.S.society of operations research professionals. It has 15,000 members. I agree that the article is crappy, and needs better sourcing, but do you really think removing it is the best way to improve the encyclopedia?

If you don't like WP:SNOW here, how about WP:SOFIXIT? —Mark Dominus (talk) 03:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I am proposing to fix it. By nominating for deletion an article that appears, via a search, not to meet Wikipedia notability criteria. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:46, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Articles don't meet notability criteria, subjects do. If you think Wikipedia is better off with no article about INFORMS, and this is a good use of your time, I won't stand in your way. Best of luck to you ! —Mark Dominus (talk) 14:50, 24 February 2026 (UTC)