User talk:Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hi Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane! I noticed your contributions to 2010 BSWW Mundialito and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! GlorpK4 (talk) 04:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Articles for deletion

Sorry I had to revert you edit on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total refraction. That article is only for Total reflection.

The delete process is bit arcane. I believe most users who submit "AfD" requests use the tool call "Twinkle". That tool is mentioned in the image on the Articles for deletion page. The tool will do the work once you figure out the right spot and how to use it. Johnjbarton (talk) 19:39, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I am completely new to this Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane (talk) 04:49, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
No worries! You picked an especially deep end for your swim ;-) Johnjbarton (talk) 15:30, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

The idea to delete an article about a Star Trek episode

Hello. About the article about the ST: TNG episode titled "Violations": You said that the article doesn't provide sources. That may mean that verifiability hasn't been established in the preferred way, by enabling readers to see why Wikipedia editors made the statements that are made in the article.

When there are uncited claims, the claims may still be verifiable, and it's just that Wikipedia fails to help readers verify them. That does not in itself mean that such claims are unverifiable, but it does mean that the policy about helping readers verify information, called "Verifiability" (imagine that it was called "Policy about helping readers verify information in Wikipedia articles while reading the articles without a need to make web searches or go to a library"), is not being followed.

This problem is sometimes easy to fix: Editors can find sources about the subject, check the statements made against the sources, and add a supporting citation for statements which are supported. If they cannot find sources themselves, they can ask other editors for help.

Ultimately, editors may remove information for which they could not find supporting sources and for which sourcing is unlikely to be found.

They may also remove all of the unsourced information right away, list the available sources, and begin writing the article pretty much from scratch.

All of that is only tangentially connected to the question of deletion. No TNG episode article should be deleted, because all of those episodes are wp:Notable. Editors already know that sources exist for each individual episode, but some episodes' articles are quite neglected. Please see Wikipedia:Notability § Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article.

I have listed some sources in the Deletion review discussion. If you would like to edit articles about Star Trek episodes, you may use those sources to improve this article. There's no use in trying to get this deleted, because it's not the right approach. Sincerely—Alalch E. 16:30, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seth MacFarlane's unrealized projects

Hello, Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Zanahary, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Seth MacFarlane's unrealized projects, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Zanahary}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Zanahary 03:44, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

I was thinking maybe instead just use it as a draft article Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane (talk) 12:50, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

20th Century Animation template

Coincidentally, a few days before you added a bunch of titles to this template, I posted a query on the talk page asking for an explanation for the listings under "Associated productions", with the intention to remove them all. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I reckon the additions have been made erroneously, perhaps confusing titles produced by the studio with all animated films released by 20th Century Fox.

I plan to strip out all unrelated titles from the template. If you have any comments, please contribute to the conversation at the talk page. Barry Wom (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seth MacFarlane's unrealized projects (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lijil was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I don't see how this topic fulfils WP:GNG - it shouldn't be a separate article. How about adding some of the content to the main article on Seth MacFarlane instead?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lijil (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lijil (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm Doniago, and welcome to Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Warm Bodies (film), it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Seth MacFarlane's unrealized projects

Information icon Hello, Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seth MacFarlane's unrealized projects, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seth MacFarlane's unrealized projects (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RedShellMomentum was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Seth MacFarlane. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RedShellMomentum 19:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you and your cane!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
For your user page. Bearian (talk) 22:06, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clika has been accepted

Clika, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScalarFactor (talk) 00:33, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Mike Allen 00:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

How is it vandalism? Can you explain? I have seen the movie, and Cold Storage is a dark comedy.--Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane (talk) 14:09, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Information icon Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If an edit seems like vandalism but you cannot confirm that it likely is, don't warn the user. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 16:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

No, you are engaging in what appears to be in an edit war. For one, you keep reverting edits for no reason whatsoever. I fixed an error in the filmography that someone forgot to fix, and there was NO NEED to revert. And two, that photo from 2013 was taken off from the article so I managed to restore it from the article. So no, you had no reason to revert it. You need to stop this immediately. Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane (talk) 16:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Stop icon Your recent editing history at Dan Povenmire shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipediaespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workwhether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each timecounts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringeven if you do not violate the three-revert rule if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 16:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Look who's talking. You're the one who's started the edit war, dude. I fixed an error, and you're just reverting for no reason. You need to stop this.--Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane (talk) 16:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. I reverted using WP:BRD, I will only talk on the appropriate talk page. You started this. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 17:02, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Bro, I didn't start anything. You're the one the who kept reverting my edits for no reason. You need to stop this and show some respect. So with that being said, you're the one who brought this upon yourself. Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Futurama, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at C.H.U.D., you may be blocked from editing. tony 02:42, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

That was actually a mistake on my behalf and I didn't mean to revert that one. Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane (talk) 02:43, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
Apologies for being so quick with the heavy warning! --tony 02:54, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for understanding Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane (talk) 02:55, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Template:Smiling Friends

Information icon Hello, Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:Smiling Friends, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Please slow down with the categories. Many are disputed, and others appear incorrect. There are WP:NODEADLINES here, and another editor has started a discussion here on the topic. I suggest waiting until that discussion comes to a consensus before you resume adding franchise categories to articles. EducatedRedneck (talk) 17:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo
Hello! Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 03:53, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Template:Smiling Friends

Hello, Dr. Gregory House's Missing Cane. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Template:Smiling Friends".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI