User talk:E43-VrGa

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to El Fandi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: El Fandi was changed by E43-VrGa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921497 on 2026-05-13T04:56:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:56, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Anusha Rahman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 06:32, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

John S. Bradstreet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Minnastronomer (talk) 05:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Very nice work for such a new user. Is this your first time on wikipedia? Minnastronomer (talk) 05:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

No, I have many accounts but I cant access them anymore E43-VrGa (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

@E43-VrGa: why can't you access those accounts? --gurkubondinn 19:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Dolores Vázquez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. ~ A412 ^talk! 15:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Dolores Vázquez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. Cicada1010 (talk) 18:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Nguyễn Thiên Phụng requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. --gurkubondinn 19:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on John S. Bradstreet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. --gurkubondinn 20:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to MV Ping Shin 101 killings, Dolores Vázquez, Nguyễn Thiên Phụng, and John S. Bradstreet seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. --gurkubondinn 20:07, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to edit Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), you may be blocked from editing. Adding LLM-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia. Electricmemory (talk) In solidarity 18:26, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

I have tagged Prince Group transnational criminal organization case for speedy deletion based on LLM use. Details are on that article's talk page. I messed up the template which was supposed to warn you, I'm sorry, but if you visit the page you'll see a statement of your options. My reason was pervasive source errors that suggest there was no hand-checking of LLM input: wrong article titles, wrong dates, and sources which did not say what they were quoted as saying. It's an article that really ought to exist and I hope you or someone else will write a version with no LLM use. M kuhner (talk) 07:13, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prince Group transnational criminal organization case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Group transnational criminal organization case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

M kuhner (talk) 15:57, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

The article Mihovil Abramić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

LLM use, see WP:AI noticeboard § User:E43-VrGa. Mismatch between sources and text.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. M kuhner (talk) 22:08, 21 June 2026 (UTC)