User talk:Edard Socceryg

Give a justification for why you reverted the new header image on Kuala Lumpur. Otherwise this activity seems like you are specifically targeting me and my edits, invoking WP:Harass, especially as you haven't shown any interest in those pages. You will be reported if this continues, and I think you'll find my case has much more ground to stand on than yours. LivinAWestLife (talk) 00:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

I edited it because of the resolution. But I forgot that the previous photo was more recent. Your edits in Tehran alone prove that you are not accurate enough in the images. Edard Socceryg (talk) 00:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

It's highly promotional. With sportsmen, and most other careers, you have real facts, such as goal scoring record, honours and international caps, and on the other hand you have opinions which should be clearly presented as such, whereas you present them as real facts, leading to gushing praise such as honing his skills... Fakhrian has gained attention for his engaging personality... offering a humorous remark... a spectacular goal... resonated widely on social media... a versatile forward, adept at playing as a striker or winger on either flank. Known for his energy and dynamism, he brings pace and flair to attacking play, often described as a high-energy player with a knack for scoring crucial goals. His acrobatic goal... widely celebrated online, highlighted his technical skill and flair for dramatic moments. Predominantly right-footed, he is comfortable using both feet, enabling him to cut inside from the wings or finish clinically as a central striker. Fakhrian’s quick bursts of speed and precise finishing make him effective in high-pressure matches... As of 2025, his development suggests potential for further growth in consistency and physicality This is real fanboy stuff, with no suggestion that these are sport's writers' opinions rather than objective facts. And why is Tasmin News Agency seen as an independent third-party source?

You make life difficult for reviewers by bundling all your refs at the end of a paragraph, with a ridiculous eight at the end of "Style of play". Put each ref after the relevant claim, and make it clear that these are the opinions of sports writers, famous for hyperbole in their writings, rather than measurable facts.

You are correct about the lead and the tables, nowiki code here {{Short description|Iranian football player}} {{Infobox football biography | name = Mojtaba Fakhrian | fullname = | image = | caption = Fakhrian playing for [[Persepolis F.C.|Persepolis]] in 2025 | birth_date = {{birth date and age|df=y|2003|5|15}} | birth_place = [[Qazvin]], Iran | height = 1.77 m | currentclub = [[Persepolis F.C.|Persepolis]] | clubnumber = | position = [[Forward (association football)|Forward]], [[Midfielder#Winger|Winger]] | youthyears1 = 2016–2017 | youthclubs1 = [[Paykan F.C.|Paykan]] | youthyears2 = 2017–2020 | youthclubs2 = [[KIA Football Academy|KIA]] | youthyears3 = 2020–2022 | youthclubs3 = [[Paykan F.C.|Paykan]] | years1 = 2022–2023 | clubs1 = [[Aluminium Arak F.C.|Aluminium]] | caps1 = 3 | goals1 = 0 | years2 = 2023–2025 | clubs2 = [[Shams Azar F.C.|Shams Azar]] | caps2 = 40 | goals2 = 7 | years3 = 2025– | clubs3 = [[Persepolis F.C.|Persepolis]] | caps3 = 0 | goals3 = 0 | nationalyears1 = 2021 | nationalteam1 = [[Iran national under-20 football team|Iran U20]] | nationalcaps1 = 9 | nationalgoals1 = 1 | nationalyears2 = 2023 | nationalteam2 = [[Iran national under-23 football team|Iran U23]] | nationalcaps2 = 1 | nationalgoals2 = 0 | club-update = 18 May 2025 }} '''Mojtaba Fakhrian''' ({{langx|fa|مجتبی فخریان}}; born 15 May 2003) is an Iranian professional [[Association football|footballer]] who plays as a [[Forward (association football)|forward]] for [[Persian Gulf Pro League]] club [[Persepolis F.C.|Persepolis]]. == Early life == ==Club career== ===Aluminium=== Fakhrian joined [[Aluminium Arak F.C.|Aluminium Arak]] in 2022 and left the club without playing many matches.{{fact}} === Shams Azar === ===Persepolis=== == Player profile == ==Career statistics== {{updated|18 May 2025}} {| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;" |- !rowspan="2"|Club !rowspan="2"|Division !rowspan="2"|Season !colspan="2"|League !colspan="2"|[[Hazfi Cup]] !colspan="2"|[[Asian Football Confederation|Asia]] ! colspan="2" |Other !colspan="2"|Total |- ! Apps !! Goals !! Apps !! Goals !! Apps !! Goals !Apps !Goals!! Apps !! Goals |- | rowspan="2" |[[Aluminium Arak F.C.|Aluminium Arak]] | rowspan="1" |[[Persian Gulf Cup|Pro League]] |[[2022–23 Persian Gulf Pro League|2022–23]] |3||0||0||0|| colspan="2" |—|| colspan="2" |—|| 3||0 |- ! colspan="2" |Total !3!!0!!0!!0!!colspan="2" |— ! colspan="2" |—!!3!!0 |- | rowspan="3" |[[Shams Azar F.C.|Shams Azar]] | rowspan="2" |[[Persian Gulf Cup|Pro League]] |[[2023–24 Persian Gulf Pro League|2023–24]] |17||3||1||0|| colspan="2"|— ||colspan="2"|—||18||3 |- |[[2024–25 Persian Gulf Pro League|2024–25]] |23||4||1||0|| colspan="2"|— || colspan="2"|— ||24||4 |- ! colspan="2" |Total !40!!7!!2!!0!! colspan="2"|—!! colspan="2"|—!!42!!7 |- | rowspan="2" |[[Persepolis F.C.|Persepolis]] | rowspan="1" |[[Persian Gulf Cup|Pro League]] |[[2025–26 Persian Gulf Pro League|2025–26]] |0||0||0||0|| colspan="2" |—|| colspan="2" |—||0||0 |- ! colspan="2" |Total !0!!0!!0!!0!!0!!0 !0!!0!!0!!0 |- ! colspan="3" |Career totals !43!!7!!2!!0!!0!!0!!0!!0!!45!!7 |} ==Honours== '''Individual''' * [[Shams Azar F.C.|Shams Azar]] Top Goalscorer: [[2024–25 Persian Gulf Pro League|2024–25]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=عملکرد استعدادهای جوان در بیست‌وچهارمین دوره لیگ برتر {{!}} فرهیختگان آنلاین |url=https://farhikhtegandaily.com/amp/205258/%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%84%DA%A9%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA%E2%80%8C%D9%88%DA%86%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%87-%D9%84%DB%8C%DA%AF-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AA%D8%B1/ |access-date=2025-05-18 |website=farhikhtegandaily.com}}</ref> ==References== {{Reflist|2}} ==External links== {{Commons}} *{{Soccerway|mojtaba-fakhrian/895083}} {{Persepolis F.C. squad}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Fakhrian, Mojtaba}} [[Category:2003 births]] [[Category:Sportspeople from Qazvin]] [[Category:Living people]] [[Category:21st-century Iranian sportsmen]] [[Category:Men's association football forwards]] [[Category:Iranian men's footballers]] [[Category:Iran men's youth international footballers]] [[Category:Persepolis F.C. players]] [[Category:Aluminium Arak F.C. players]] [[Category:Persian Gulf Pro League players]]

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:55, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Thebiguglyalien. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 01:52, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

hello

since I wrote thoroughly why your edit is not suitable and you did not give a hoot about explaining your idea and reverted my edit, I came to your talk page. as I humbly mentioned, an unfinished (though magnificent) project is not proper for being mentioned as a first picture of a huge and historical city. the dome of Mosalla has recently been tiled and your proposed picture is dated (no tile). maybe it is just the matter of "taste" (?), but I guess sooner or later, that picture will be removed by some other user.

Best Regards

The.shahab (talk) 16:53, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Jay8g [V•T•E] 04:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:28, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Edard_Socceryg reported by User:AlexBobCharles (Result: ). Thank you. AlexBobCharles (talk) 13:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Edard_Socceryg. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluethricecreamman (talk • contribs) 18:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Edard Socceryg. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Barkeep49 (talk) 17:19, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

While I've blocked here, I would be pretty open to accepting an unblock request on the CU side of things and with some sympathy on the threats which earned the inital block. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC)