User talk:Endricklamar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hi Endricklamar! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
WP:ECP gaming
We have filters that detect when users are making pointless edits to gain WP:ECP status. Please don't do that; we can revoke ECP status if it is achieved this way. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Explosão helicóptero.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Explosão helicóptero.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Endricklamar! Your additions to Armed conflict for control of the favelas have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- sorry I added the image because it was present in another wiki, the portuguese one, and I've thought that I could add it even in eng wiki. Endricklamar (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
- My message was not about an image. I was referring to prose that was a match for content found at https://insightcrime.org/news/brazils-drug-war-costs-favela-economies-millions-study/ — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:23, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
- sorry I was answearing another thing and I've answeared the wrong one. Anyway, I've readed the key points and I'll not do it again. Endricklamar (talk) 12:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
- My message was not about an image. I was referring to prose that was a match for content found at https://insightcrime.org/news/brazils-drug-war-costs-favela-economies-millions-study/ — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:23, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Further copyright issues
Endricklamar, this is a continuation of the issue raised above by Diannaa several days ago. The final bullet point on her post to you is Copying and translation within Wikipedia. Please review the page on Copying content within Wikipedia.
With this edit, you have taken content written by other editors (that requires attribution to those editors) from another article. This is a different type of copyright violation; that content should not be attributed to you, rather the authors who wrote it at Proposed United States invasion of Venezuela. The WP:CWW page explains that you must attribute the writing, and how to do that with an edit summary. I will next add a template to the talk page to correct that error, except that ...
I'm not sure an entire article was needed for three new sentences, but I don't have time to deal with a merge proposal on top of the copying within. Please be sure to attribute in the future when copying the work of others editors. If you have done this sort of copying within Wikipedia elsewhere, that means all of your edits need to be checked. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- I know, but it was essential for a background about how it degenerated to the naval attack. I'm sorry Endricklamar (talk) 23:05, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- It was more background than necessary, and you must use an edit summary that attributes the writing of others, with a link, whenever you copy within. Have you done this elsewhere? If so, you need to go back and add a template as I did at Talk:Proposed United States invasion of Venezuela. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- I do not know how to do it Endricklamar (talk) 05:49, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Here's the template I added as an example. The parameters are the article you copied from, the article you copied to, the date, and the oldids. Do you know how to find an oldid? (See Help:Oldid.) But ... I had to add {{Copied from}} to the article's talk page only because you didn't attribute in the edit summary when you copied the content. It would have been much easier for you to attribute in the edit summary when you first copied the content to begin with. (See here.) That is, when you made this edit, where you copied the work of other editors:
- ... you should have used an edit summary that said:
- Content partially copied from Proposed United States invasion of Venezuela
- If you had done that, then you wouldn't have to add anything to the talk page. By providing a link back to the work you copied, you are giving attribution, and then you don't have to do anything else. Does it help to read this page? Would it be easier if I explained in Spanish? Let me know if you need more help, or if you need me to add a template in another case where you copied. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 06:48, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- I do not know how to do it Endricklamar (talk) 05:49, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- It was more background than necessary, and you must use an edit summary that attributes the writing of others, with a link, whenever you copy within. Have you done this elsewhere? If so, you need to go back and add a template as I did at Talk:Proposed United States invasion of Venezuela. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Latin Times
Please see WP:IBTIMES and International Business Times. The Latin Times is an IBT paper, and is not a reliable source. If it is the only source mentioning something, that something is likely WP:UNDUE. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:28, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 17:04, 10 September 2025 (UTC)