User talk:Ernne

Hello, Eddiitt0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mazewaxie 11:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Noting for any passerbys that this block didn't come out of nowhere and this editor does actually have a history of being warned (these warnings have all been reverted, check the page history). This editor has a pattern of disruptive edits, especially at misandry. This recent edit in particular stands out. This is another example although not as recent. Given the lack of change in response to warnings and disruptive editing in other subjects as well (look at their contribution history), I am confident this is the right call. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ernne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I was blocked for trying to make the article misandry more neutral ok, I will not edit political articles again and i will not care again about articles that I and some people think they are biased to liberalism Ernne (talk) 10:38, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Admitted to block evasion, so I'm updated the block rationale. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:03, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there! Can you review Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, then explain why your edits violated this policy? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:42, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

the moderator blocked me indefinitely because I tried repeatedly to move the third paragraph of the article opening to another section of the article, please get rid of this block thanks, the moderator thought that moving the third paragraph to the lower section of the article means i am distruptive --Ernne (talk) 18:15, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

This does not address the POV issues relating to your block. Additionally, I have reinstated the block notice with Clovermoss's rationale for blocking as this is relevant to those reviewing this block. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:09, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade: I read neutral point of view policy, I even quoted these rules in my discussion in that article when I told them that instead of referring to the opinions of the authors in another section, their opinions are referred to immediately after 2 paragraphs in the opening of the article, there are 3 paragraphs criticizing the term misandry compared to 2 paragraphs explaining what is misandry, clearly the article is not neutral, because it criticize the term misandry more than explaining it, they refused to let me move these paragraphs to other sections, and said i am disruptive even though I didn't delete these paragraphs, I suggested renaming the article to criticism of the term misandry since the beginning of the article criticize the term misandry more than explaining it but they also refused, I don't care anymore about the article misandry I just want you to lift the block because I want to edit some articles especially about entertainment, blocking my IP indefinitely for trying to move paragraphs to other section is exaggerated, and it is been a year and that is enough thanks

@Significa liberdade: it's been 4 days and no reply yet, I made useful contributions with sources, if i am unblocked i will avoid politics and focus on making more contributions --Ernne (talk) 18:43, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Can you point me to where you suggested the misandry article be moved to criticisms of misandry? Looking on the talk page archive, I'm only seeing a conversation where you criticized the article and editors explained why the sources you were using were unreliable ().

Beyond this, it's disingenuous to claim you were blocked "for trying to move paragraphs". Clovermoss specifically states, "Noting for any passerbys that this block didn't come out of nowhere and this editor does actually have a history of being warned". I can understand the choice to move a few paragraphs. However, this block appears to have come following multiple warnings about your edits. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:20, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Also, as I stated in the procedural decline, please be patient. Administrators are volunteers, and only some of them work on unblock requests. At this moment, there are nearly 100 open unblock requests. Your request is on the list and will be managed in time. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:20, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade: this is where I suggested the misandry article to be moved to criticisms of misandry, in my other account, the reason I have other account is because I lost the account a long time ago because of password then I restored the account, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Misandry/Archive_7#Nonjudgmental_language,_opinion_vs._fact, please don't accuse me of being disingenuous, clearly she was referring to the article, she even put the link of my edits in the article, most Wikipedians were warned repeatedly about their edits but they were not blocked indefinitely, they were just blocked for weeks, she want to enforce liberal views on Wikipedia by blocking me forever on Wikipedia because I tried to make the article more neutral, this is the reason why people don't trust Wikipedia, because of liberal biases, if you don't want to unblock me, it is ok I don't care anymore, wikipedia is not real life, I got a life, I don't care if a clovermoss don't want me to edit in wikipedia again because I am less liberal than her --Ernne (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for sharing the link to the discussion. Given that you were blocked on this account at the time you requested the page move, the edit counts as block evasion and sockpuppetry. As such, I will update your block notice to address this additional issue. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:03, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

User:Significa liberdade please unblock me I want to edit articles about entertainment I dont care about politics anymore --Ernne (talk) 13:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade:

why you don't reply it is been 3 days or more --Ernne (talk) 06:19, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ernne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

reposting because of delay it is been 3 days since my first request the moderator blocked me indefinitely because I tried repeatedly to move the third paragraph of the article opening to another section of the article, please get rid of this block thanks, she thought that moving the third paragraph to the lower section of the article repeatedly means i am distruptive u didnt delete anything i just tried to move a part to a different section

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Please only open one unblock request at a time, and please be patient. Administrators are volunteers, and only some of them work on unblock requests. At this moment, there are nearly 100 open unblock requests. Your request is on the list and will be managed in time. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ernne Ernne (talk) 08:45, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:04, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Reviewing editors should also take note of the previous block by Clovermoss, which had not been lifted. As such, Ernne is now blocked for disruptive editing and socking. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2025 (UTC)