User talk:Gone Extinct

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Old Dutch Owl has been accepted

Old Dutch Owl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dutch Helmet has been accepted

Dutch Helmet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ktkvtsh (talk) 07:18, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Great work on the article Dutch Helmet. Ktkvtsh (talk) 07:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mookee pigeon (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mikeycdiamond was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mikeycdiamond (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Gone Extinct! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mikeycdiamond (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mookee pigeon has been accepted

Mookee pigeon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
I'm also not too sure about the AI decline previously, no hard tells that I've noticed in that version. Cheers! monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
Oh thanks! The reason is because i had initially included a very long-winded and clunky recounting of all the pigeon's potential colour morphs which honestly did look a little like the product of an LLM. I hashed out the problem with the user who decline dit and clarified that I could never bring myself to use AI for an article and then fixed it in accordance. Thanks for adding it to the article space! Gone Extinct (talk) 13:36, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Mookee page

Wonderful Mookee page! Looking forward to reading your other contributions.

~~~John Verburg JohnVerburg (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Glad it satisfied your standard haha Gone Extinct (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dolphin 1 animal (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article only relies on a single source, (a forum thread). It could be better to wait until reliable sources discuss it, so we can know which reactions and hypotheses are actually relevant to mention.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 06:20, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI