User talk:HM2021

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unblock request

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HM2021 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

Was just about to come on here but all of a sudden I get this. Can I please be unblocked? It's like being locked away from society and left to rot in the dirt.

Decline reason:

You need to say whether you have abused multiple accounts or not. PhilKnight (talk) 23:59, 8 September 2025 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HM2021 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

You must understand that 1. I am not related in any way or form to User:Nate Speed and 2. User:Mhvp2012 has never been used for years, so how could I have done what I did to multiple accounts? I did not. And reporting off-wiki activity on me to VRT is just not right. I have a right to my privacy. Just let me out of this and let me continue to contribute. There were even specific pages I made that were deleted that shouldn't have been and I request they be undeleted as none of them contained any COI issues: "Et Tu (film)," "Draft:Blake Winston Rice," "Astra Midseason Movie Award for Most Anticipated Film," "Astra Midseason Movie Award for Best Picture," "Draft:The Lens Within Me", "Tea (film)", "Draft:The Delicate Medium"

Decline reason:

Per the significant evidence presented at the SPI and corresponding VRT ticket. Ponyobons mots 20:03, 9 September 2025 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UNBLOCK ME. PLEASE.

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HM2021 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

You can't keep me locked up forever like this. What is it about me that makes me look like I'm doing more harm than good? To see this site turn more and more authoritarian each and every day scares me. I see the errors of my ways and promise to not abuse multiple accounts again. Just let me out and let me contribute. Just say the word. Wikipedia is supposed to be the "free encyclopedia" when it isn't so at all.

Decline reason:

Your promise to stop abusing multiple accounts rings hollow when you were doing so within the past week. You continue to work hard to demonstrate you haven't the slightest intention of abiding by our policies and guidelines. Yamla (talk) 18:27, 10 September 2025 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HM2021, while you may remove most things from your talk page, declined unblock requests are an exception, and may not be removed while blocked. See WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK for more. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Unblock request

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HM2021 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

Since a week has passed, I thought everything over and understand what I have done. I'm sorry for calling this website "authoritarian" when it was so stupid and foolish on my part and promise not to abuse multiple accounts again. HM2021 (talk) 20:08, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You should request unblock from your original account. I would also suggest waiting six months as a show of good faith- but that's up to you. 331dot (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

I'm not an admin, but given that you were encouraged to wait six months and barely let two weeks pass before submitting another unblock request, I wouldn't hold out much hope of this working out for you. As a show of good faith, you might withdraw this on your own recognizance before an admin declines it. I'm also concerned that if you continue pushing to be unblocked your Talk page access will be revoked. You're not building anyone's confidence in you by submitting such frequent unblock requests. DonIago (talk) 02:54, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gabriel LaBelle as Sammy Fabelman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gabriel LaBelle as Sammy Fabelman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Category:Long Island International Film Expo award winners has been nominated for deletion

Category:Long Island International Film Expo award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 05:00, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Wizard of Oz at Sphere

Information icon Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Wizard of Oz at Sphere, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:Astra Midseason Movie Award for Best Picture

Template:Astra Midseason Movie Award for Best Picture has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 12:35, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:Astra Midseason Movie Award for Most Anticipated Film

Template:Astra Midseason Movie Award for Most Anticipated Film has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 12:36, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Wizard of Oz at Sphere

Hello, HM2021. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Wizard of Oz at Sphere".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 00:29, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI